Live data from Hacker News

Things created with GPT-4

twitter.com

31–40 of 69 posts

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#31

Clicked on the second one and was immediately presented with a course to teach me how to use this fancy new AI-powered technology to revolutionize my business! Puts a certain taste in my mouth.

A lot of click-bait and "coaching" is spread under the term "ChatGPT". Reminds me of the 238th iteration of a calculator for the AppStore years ago just to have an app at the AppStore.

Marketers learned to sell shovels. Understanding their business model is important.

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#32
On one hand this is stunning.

On the other hand, almost everything shown here either generic or crap (or both).

I'm happy that chatgpt writes boilerplate code for me so that I don't have to but I'm not seeing the revolution yet.

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#33
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Those imagined computers now look more like upgrades to current technology. I still don't get that argument. You can train a parrot for a week and he'll talk a few words, training it for a year won't make him become Shakespeare, LLMs will never ever automagically evolve into these AGI tier computers, not even their creators argue that, no one besides techbros argue that in fact.

I can, right now, have GPT 4 write me sonnets on any topic. We are already beyond mere parroting. People say "it's just parroting what it's heard"! But did GPT4's training data really include a sonnet about Minecraft creepers? So they're not parroting. They're parroting PLUS something else. Plus some kind of analysis and transformation. Your claim is that this transformation is superficial and won't become deeper as…

Yes you can cherry pick things that work very well, in the meantime it still can't rhyme in French, which is 12 years old type of intelligence

It's wrong > 50% of the time for anything semi complex and semi niche, that's not AGI, no one in the field of AI argue it's AGI, only people on twitter and reddit with absolutely no background in tech and/or AI argue it's AGI

It's a very very very good chatbot, built with very very impressive technology and amount of data, which is already quite impressive and definitely a big milestone, it's not AGI, not even close

It's like saying the leather auger of my swiss army knife is a step towards an aerospace grade titanium cutting CNC machine

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#34
post #24

I built a web app that lets you generate simple, shareable web apps just by prompting with GPT4. https://picoapps.xyz Here are some cool apps people have built with it: read aloud a wikipedia article: https://backend-pico.onrender.com/northeast-architect matrix animation: https://backend-pico.onrender.com/chair-northeast face distorter: https://backend-pico.onrender.com/drench-virtual simple excel: https://backend-pi…

This is awesome!

I'm doing something similar but for backend.

Is picoapps frontend-only for now or do you generate both the front and enough of a backend to eg save what the user creates?

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#35

This current moment is super impressive, but the output of the models is still mediocre. I worry that over the next 12-24 months, we'll be overwhelmed with autogenerated content (docs, apps, games, news) that gets a B- or C. Once the novelty wears off, no one wants to play your [terrible] autogenerated asteroid clone. There are a lot of startups that are two LLMs in a trench coat, and they will not be able to improve…

This is my worry as well. Google results are already full of content farm/AI SEO junk, and I don't understand people who see that and think "let's do that, but more".

There's already more good content than I could possibly consume in my lifetime, and all this automatically generated stuff is just going to make it harder to find.

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#36

Clicked on the second one and was immediately presented with a course to teach me how to use this fancy new AI-powered technology to revolutionize my business! Puts a certain taste in my mouth.

That's all twitter is these days. People writing content to drive engagement with some silly hook to sell whatever it is they're selling.

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#37

This current moment is super impressive, but the output of the models is still mediocre. I worry that over the next 12-24 months, we'll be overwhelmed with autogenerated content (docs, apps, games, news) that gets a B- or C. Once the novelty wears off, no one wants to play your [terrible] autogenerated asteroid clone. There are a lot of startups that are two LLMs in a trench coat, and they will not be able to improve…

> they will not be able to improve faster than people's expectations increase.

I've never read a better explanation for why "we will never have AGI." As the objective quality of AI output increases, we simply value it less.

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#38

Clicked on the second one and was immediately presented with a course to teach me how to use this fancy new AI-powered technology to revolutionize my business! Puts a certain taste in my mouth.

GPT-4 is barely 3 weeks old but have already created a business opportunity to run a paid newsletter about GPT-4!

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#39
I work in property insurtech and had lots of fun.

- Customer support chatbot. Convert knowledge base and other materials to q&a form with gpt4. Ada2 embeddings, search for questions in repository with faiss, ask gpt4 to answer. Works a lot better than standard "search with embeddings in KnowledgeBase". - Parsing out and standardizing insurance descriptions, Excels, schedules of values - Parsing out and standardizing documents like building permits, claims

For industries that have a lot of text format and can deal with some degree of statistical error as long as averages are better it's massive

Re: Things created with GPT-4

#40
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Those imagined computers now look more like upgrades to current technology. I still don't get that argument. You can train a parrot for a week and he'll talk a few words, training it for a year won't make him become Shakespeare, LLMs will never ever automagically evolve into these AGI tier computers, not even their creators argue that, no one besides techbros argue that in fact.

I've been noticing this pattern on HN where someone analogizes current generation LLMs to parrots while simultaneously claiming to know the future of LLMs without any justification. Am I a "techbro" because I don't believe that we know much about what the future of LLMs has in store for us, or because I find the parrot analogy to be utterly specious?

You're free to believe whatever you want but then we're deep into religious territory, which is fine in itself but doesn't really matter here
Post reply on HN