Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's great background information. I wonder what the primary driver of switching out is
Two of my classmates dropped out of a math graduate program. One of them actually quit right in the middle of class, saying "This is not fun anymore!". It was a Group Theory class on Galois Fields. She became a real estate agent. The other flunked his qualifiers & decided to quit the program and become a pilot (!!) instead of retaking the exams.My prof said attrition rates in math were super high.Its just not everybo…
24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
31–38 of 38 posts
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
While there might be a slight amount of skewing due to the fact that we're an online service, we have a very large data set relative to the population we're speaking about. Also, given the process of college admissions today, its fair to say that most people applying to college have access to a computer. In addition, there is more than the NCAA, such as the NAIA and Junior Colleges. We take all that into account.
Interesting. If I were interested in the current recruiting landscape for high school athletes, do you happen to know of any good survey or review-type sources? I'm curious about the context surrounding your company's service.
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
"This means that the intellectual average of student athletes is highly likely to be lower than the average of non-athletes" This applies to Michigan specifically. They are willing to make academic sacrifices for the sake of their athletic programs and (maybe) a well-rounded student body. Not all schools operate this way.
Many schools do it. Michigan is the only one who's point system was made public. But you are right, there are some who don't do this.
For example, suppose the academic ability of jocks is normally distributed about 105 with a std dev of 15, whereas non-jocks are normally distributed about 100 with the same std dev. If the cutoff for admission is 110, but athletic talent gives you a 20 point bonus, then you're your comparing mean aptitude in a sample of non-jocks, given that every observation is >= 110, to the mean aptitude in a sample of jocks, given that every observation is >= 90. Under those conditions, you'll find a 10 point difference in favor of your sample of non-jocks, even though the population mean for jocks is higher.
I think you alluded to this point in an earlier reply, but it's worth spelling out.
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's great background information. I wonder what the primary driver of switching out is
Two of my classmates dropped out of a math graduate program. One of them actually quit right in the middle of class, saying "This is not fun anymore!". It was a Group Theory class on Galois Fields. She became a real estate agent. The other flunked his qualifiers & decided to quit the program and become a pilot (!!) instead of retaking the exams.My prof said attrition rates in math were super high.Its just not everybo…
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#35I can't tell if this is supposed to be surprisingly high or surprisingly low. Either way, it is worth pointing out (perhaps to the choir) that the stereotypes of dumb jocks and fat nerds are not realistic, if they ever were. Strong minds correlate with strong bodies. Which reminds me, I need to get back in my routine, and go out there and run today after work. :)
...it is worth pointing out (perhaps to the choir) that the stereotypes of dumb jocks and fat nerds are not realistic... Within a given college, it is likely to be realistic. Take U-Mich, for example (since they are the only school to reveal their point system) - being a student athlete is worth +1.0 on GPA. I.e., a student athlete with a 2.5 is on equal footing with a non-athlete having a 3.5. This means that the in…
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#36Maybe we (as in the scientific and math-inclined) like to feel special, because 'we solve hard problems.' Maybe we were always picked last, while we watched the more athletic and popular lead. And they took our lunch money. Whatever the case, rather than trying to minimize athletes, we should try to support and encourage each other, athletic or not.
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Two of my classmates dropped out of a math graduate program. One of them actually quit right in the middle of class, saying "This is not fun anymore!". It was a Group Theory class on Galois Fields. She became a real estate agent. The other flunked his qualifiers & decided to quit the program and become a pilot (!!) instead of retaking the exams.My prof said attrition rates in math were super high.Its just not everybo…
wait, shell sort is stable?
Re: 24% of High School Student Athletes Want to be Engineers, Scientists
#38When I first started college (engineering focused school) the dean of undergrad academics had us all stand in a line and did the "look left and look right" thing - chances are that out of the 3 (yourself included), 2 of you will not make it to graduation. I thought he was joking until i got to my 4th-5th semester and a lot of folks i knew were either transferring out or switching to business type majors.
Education in engineering is a lesson in self discipline.