Funny that the founder can just submit to vote what is effectively “I need $3M USD and if that runs out additional $1M sums in perpetuity” with zero oversight on how it’s spent, outside of claiming it will be spent on legal costs.
That is about what would happen in a board meeting. And the final edit ($1m top-ups are limited to twice, then come back and ask for approval again) seems like a reasonable response.
Presumably there is some audit trail on expenses after the fact?
Honestly, I'm also flabbergasted when the guy is basically running an unregulated exchange that offers what are almost certainly unregistered securities[1] ( definitionally , the value of $SUSHI LP tokens goes up when people trade other projects' tokens, so the Howey Test is clearly violated) and freely chooses to live in the US. The SEC is shooting fish in a barrel. [1] https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sushiswap…
But he’s not exactly _running_ the exchange, is he? I mean, it’d be interesting to see how the SEC asks him to shut it down, and of course that’s actually impossible for him (or anyone really) to do.
If Tornado Cash was shut down (where everyone was pseudo-anonymous), SushiSwap can definitely be shut down. And TC wasn't exactly "shut down," it was just crippled by being blacklisted by USDC (Circle), essentially banned from all legitimate exchanges via sanctions, etc. Without liquidity, these financial toys are just dead code.
But he’s not exactly _running_ the exchange, is he? I mean, it’d be interesting to see how the SEC asks him to shut it down, and of course that’s actually impossible for him (or anyone really) to do.
If Tornado Cash was shut down (where everyone was pseudo-anonymous), SushiSwap can definitely be shut down. And TC wasn't exactly "shut down," it was just crippled by being blacklisted by USDC (Circle), essentially banned from all legitimate exchanges via sanctions, etc. Without liquidity, these financial toys are just dead code.
What's interesting is a steady stream of volume continues to flow through Tornado Cash, proving that it was indeed decentralized enough to withstand global sanctions. Although all funds exiting it are suspicious. One thing to remember is that the sanctions on TC currently only apply to US citizens and companies, although effectively given the US' dominant financial position globally, is indeed a massive red flag.
I think it's in really poor taste to compare regulators doing their job shutting down illegal activities and one of the most infamous pogroms, Kristallnacht.
People say "nuked" or make similar references to Hiroshima/Nagasaki, which I dislike for that same reason, but it's odd how that's generally given a pass.
Not to mention those smiling and giving thumbs up for a picture in the Colosseum.
I think it's in really poor taste to compare regulators doing their job shutting down illegal activities and one of the most infamous pogroms, Kristallnacht.
People say "nuked" or make similar references to Hiroshima/Nagasaki, which I dislike for that same reason, but it's odd how that's generally given a pass.
Not to get into the unrelated weeds here, I think it's the specificity. We say "nuked" but not "Hiroshima'd."
But he’s not exactly _running_ the exchange, is he? I mean, it’d be interesting to see how the SEC asks him to shut it down, and of course that’s actually impossible for him (or anyone really) to do.
If Tornado Cash was shut down (where everyone was pseudo-anonymous), SushiSwap can definitely be shut down. And TC wasn't exactly "shut down," it was just crippled by being blacklisted by USDC (Circle), essentially banned from all legitimate exchanges via sanctions, etc. Without liquidity, these financial toys are just dead code.
Tornado Cash was sanctioned by OFAC, which makes it illegal for U.S. persons to interact with the relevant contract addresses to the same extent as interacting with North Korea.
SushiSwap is not going to be sanctioned. It's not clear what the U.S. could do to shut it down in the same manner, although of course, they could bring enforcement actions like this one and scare off any U.S. person from working on it.
Funny that the founder can just submit to vote what is effectively “I need $3M USD and if that runs out additional $1M sums in perpetuity” with zero oversight on how it’s spent, outside of claiming it will be spent on legal costs.
But he’s not exactly _running_ the exchange, is he? I mean, it’d be interesting to see how the SEC asks him to shut it down, and of course that’s actually impossible for him (or anyone really) to do.
If Tornado Cash was shut down (where everyone was pseudo-anonymous), SushiSwap can definitely be shut down. And TC wasn't exactly "shut down," it was just crippled by being blacklisted by USDC (Circle), essentially banned from all legitimate exchanges via sanctions, etc. Without liquidity, these financial toys are just dead code.
The relevant bit is that the guy that is supposedly "running" this alledged unregulated security exchange can't shut it down himself. How is he running it if he's got no actual power over it?