31–40 of 667 posts
I'm still waiting for Hacker News to band together and simply start building an open model that does not require a corporate daddy like OpenAI, Microsoft, Baidu, Google, or anyone else. These models have no place being owned by corporations. The services that use these models are certainly up for grabs, but the models should be open. Who is trying to rally the community to this cause?
I'm still waiting for Hacker News to band together and simply start building an open model that does not require a corporate daddy like OpenAI, Microsoft, Baidu, Google, or anyone else. These models have no place being owned by corporations. The services that use these models are certainly up for grabs, but the models should be open. Who is trying to rally the community to this cause?
With google vs DuckDuckGo etc you can see what websites are returned, and get a sense of the kind of authoritative sources used
With this kind of tech, there’s no real way to know except by comparing precise prompts with one another. But if they’re all behind corporate walls, and they share incentives to say similar things, we’re none the wiser
I'm still waiting for Hacker News to band together and simply start building an open model that does not require a corporate daddy like OpenAI, Microsoft, Baidu, Google, or anyone else. These models have no place being owned by corporations. The services that use these models are certainly up for grabs, but the models should be open. Who is trying to rally the community to this cause?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EleutherAI
They built GPT-J and GPT-NeoX.
Maybe there's an embargo? Because normally if reporters had access, they'd immediately post results to twitter.
Here's one take: https://twitter.com/jjvincent/status/1638182196283609092
- it's faster (though presumably that's because of limited users)
- unlike Bing, it doesn't cite sources (unless it directly quotes them)
- it seems relatively constrained, giving answers that are anodyne and often dull
So it's simultaneously more neutered and less stable than what OpenAI already offers, in addition to being years behind. What exactly is the benefit to being an early adopter of this when there are better alternatives?
Overall this just seems underwhelming. Most HN comment's I've read are people saying it doesn't work with their account, doesn't work in their country, doesn't work for some other reason, or works and is very limited compared to ChatGPT.
Google what have you been up to?
> In the meantime, we asked Bard to write you a little poem while you wait.
> May your day be bright, Your mood be light, And your heart be filled with delight. ~ Bard Thank you for registering.
Cute
now its playing catch up and seems to be flailing around a bit
Pichai really is just looking like a good-times placeholder CEO
I am glad finally we know what these LLMs are made for.