Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4

openai.com

31–40 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-4

#31
post #14

I'm curious about how we can get out of the game of using OpenAI's corporate solutions and find ways to open up access to these kinds of models for broader use by anyone. I don't want to be consumed by another corporation in this next wave...

By supporting, participating in and using projects like this by LAION:

https://open-assistant.io

Re: GPT-4

#32

Is there anything we could do to have them stop calling themselves OpenAI ? They are so far from open at this point. In Germany at least, you're not allowed to have a misleading name for your company

Opendoor? OpenTable? Lots of companies have "open" in their names for all sorts of different reasons.

Re: GPT-4

#34

Looks like there's a waitlist https://openai.com/waitlist/gpt-4-api There's also a link that says "Try on ChatGPT Plus", but that takes me to a page that still says "ChatGPT Feb 13 Version" Looks like somebody jumped the gun on publishing this post.

There's also a link that says "Try on ChatGPT Plus", but that takes me to a page that still says "ChatGPT Feb 13 Version"

If you subscribe to ChatGPT Plus, that link will take you to ChatGPT Plus. Otherwise it just takes you to free ChatGPT Feb 13.

Re: GPT-4

#35
What's the biggest difference over what's currently deployed at https://chat.openai.com/ now (which is GPT-3.5, right?)

That it accepts images?

As per the article:

> In a casual conversation, the distinction between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can be subtle. The difference comes out when the complexity of the task reaches a sufficient threshold—GPT-4 is more reliable, creative, and able to handle much more nuanced instructions than GPT-3.5.

Not sure what "vision vs no vision" means?

Re: GPT-4

#36

What's the next big hurdle for GPT to overcome? (this is being asked by someone with limited AI/ML knowledge)

Giving correct answers based on facts and saying it is not sure when it is not

Re: GPT-4

#37
I think it's interesting that they've benchmarked it against an array of standardized tests. Seems like LLMs would be particularly well suited to this kind of test by virtue of it being simple prompt:response, but I have to say...those results are terrifying. Especially when considering the rate of improvement. bottom 10% to top 10% of LSAT in What are the implications for society when general thinking, reading, and writing becomes like Chess? Even the best humans in the world can only hope to be 98% accurate their moves (and the idea of 'accuracy' here only existing because we have engines that know, unequivocally the best move), and only when playing against other humans - there is no hope of defeating even less advanced models.

What happens when ALL of our decisions can be assigned an accuracy score?

Re: GPT-4

#38

Is there anything we could do to have them stop calling themselves OpenAI ? They are so far from open at this point. In Germany at least, you're not allowed to have a misleading name for your company

This gets brought up in every thread involving the words OpenAI, can we maybe just talk about the release?

Re: GPT-4

#39
Oh wow, image inputs? So I can get ChatGPT to describe an image, in lesser or greater detail? And through an API? Wow, that'll be so cool!

Re: GPT-4

#40
Asking ChatGPT+ if it is GPT-4 results in

> As an AI language model, I am not given an official name like "GPT-4". However, I am a continuation of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) series of models developed by OpenAI. Currently, the most advanced version of the GPT series is GPT-3, which I am a part of. There has been no official announcement or confirmation regarding the development of a new version of GPT beyond GPT-3.

It doesn't seem to have image upload functionality yet either. Perhaps it is still rolling out?

Post reply on HN