> No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer. i'm out of touch with how much of this works, can someone explain how this is paid without burden to the taxpayer?
Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
31–40 of 1001 posts
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#32Any fiat crypto rails left in the US, after the FDIC buries SEN on, I dunno, Tuesday?
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#33Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#34How?! Who is funding this and if they sell the bank assets who is covering the losses?
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#35All depositors will be made whole. Good news. Wonder how many more will still fail this week.
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#36How exactly are they guaranteeing all deposits? They claim to not be bailing them out and they haven't found a seller. I'm smelling bullshit.
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#37So, they can all go tomorrow morning and withdraw/transfer their money out of SVB?
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#38All depositors will be made whole. Good news. Wonder how many more will still fail this week.
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#39Sort of burying the lede - also states that all SVB depositors will be made whole along with Signature depositors.
> We are also announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank, New York, New York, which was closed today by its state chartering authority. All depositors of this institution will be made whole. As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer.
To me, that last sentence about SVB is distinct and separate and not implying that the previous sentence about Signature depositors applies to SVB. But you could be right as well, I don't think it's clear.
Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC
#40Thus, on one hand, I'm glad they're doing this, as it should help prevent wider bank runs, and it ensures that banks are the ones that are actually paying for it.
At the same time, this is yet another example of changing the rules in the middle of the game. Yellen has just broadcast that FDIC insurance is essentially unlimited, as long as you can threaten wider disruption to the economy.
I understand part of this is human nature but I really wish we could plan for these entirely foreseeable events ahead of time so that it's not just cases of "selective justice" with regards to who gets bailed out.