Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's almost as impressive as the UI.
Another point in function over design, just like Craigslist.
PoF is successful in spite of its questionable design, not because of it.
31–40 of 69 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's almost as impressive as the UI.
Another point in function over design, just like Craigslist.
PoF is successful in spite of its questionable design, not because of it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do an article on Netflix! NAO!
What does "NAO" mean?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another point in function over design, just like Craigslist.
Not really. Contrast the cluttered mess that is PoF to OkCupid, which has decent usability and reasonable information architecture. OkC's design is also better at extracting the right information from more users more consistently, meaning the resulting corpus of data is more complete. Which makes for a better product, since it's easier to find the sort of people you'd be into. PoF is successful in spite of its questi…
He used to post on webmasterworld as he was developing the site. Some interesting stuff. And it's on IIS which blew my mind. webmasterworld.com/profilev4.cgi?action=view&member=markus007
> And it's on IIS which blew my mind. I think that says a lot more about you than about IIS. It's mature software, why wouldn't it perform on par with other mature webservers?
Slashdot, Facebook, Wikipedia, etc were the very large sites talking about what they used over the years and it was all about the open source stuff like Apache, PHP, etc.
Then I found out, on HN, that POF used IIS and it was mind blowing. You would think even Microsoft would promote its successful uses more like that. Until POF, I too had assumed IIS was only for 1,000 to 50,000 enterprisey setups. I didn't think it couldn't be used per se, but I just hadn't ever heard of it being used that way until POF either.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another point in function over design, just like Craigslist.
Not really. Contrast the cluttered mess that is PoF to OkCupid, which has decent usability and reasonable information architecture. OkC's design is also better at extracting the right information from more users more consistently, meaning the resulting corpus of data is more complete. Which makes for a better product, since it's easier to find the sort of people you'd be into. PoF is successful in spite of its questi…
I would say there were about 15 people in the office at the time (1.5 years ago)
Markus is a slightly weird Rain Man kinda guy, but is obviously very smart. A bit smug, though likely deservedly.
He has a hot girlfriend, that is the head of marketing or something.
It was a three on one interview, which isn't very welcoming. No whiteboard, no code writing. Kinda glad I didn't get it, actually.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. Contrast the cluttered mess that is PoF to OkCupid, which has decent usability and reasonable information architecture. OkC's design is also better at extracting the right information from more users more consistently, meaning the resulting corpus of data is more complete. Which makes for a better product, since it's easier to find the sort of people you'd be into. PoF is successful in spite of its questi…
Sounds like a worse is better case study.
So poor usability actually is a feature.
Which comes back to the old argument about advertising-driven revenue models resulting in poor user experiences, since the "user" from a revenue model is the advertiser and YOU'RE the product.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like a worse is better case study.
Take all this with a grain of salt, as I'm about to get vague and handwave-y. According to some article I read [citation needed], the fact that their interface is crap actually drives more pageviews. E.g., that profile pictures are distorted is searches actually encourages people to click through to profiles to see better-looking photos. So poor usability actually is a feature. Which comes back to the old argument ab…