Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

T-code – A protocol for implementing UART serial communications to an adult toy

stpihkal.docs.buttplug.io

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 81 posts

Re: T-code – A protocol for implementing UART serial communications to an adult toy

#31

Post by noduerme »

oefrha wrote: post #9
culi wrote: post #3

one of these days one of these toys is gonna have IFTT integration or a webhook

Pretty sure camgirls have been using vibrators connected to online gifting systems for a long time.

well see, the problem is those systems are all closed source and centralized through servers run by pimps. A FOSS protocol for remote manipulation of vibrational devices on N-axes is just the sort of thing needed to kick off a committee that'll spend the next ten years drafting a plan to decentralize vaginas.

[Edit: Also, blockchain! My GOD why has no one made a vibrator that only vibrates once a payment block is confirmed 6 times?]

Re: T-code – A protocol for implementing UART serial communications to an adult toy

#35

Post by quenix »

sofixa wrote: post #26
kleiba wrote: post #23

To what degree do modern sex toys come with sensors in addition to actuators? With enough usage, you could employ ML to learn the "optimal" reaction of the toy to the current sensor state. Of course, additional (external) sensors would probably help but probably be too intrusive.

Somebody has already done this - (original was deleted so had to pass through a third party cacher) https://www.unddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1f607z/comment/c...

What a bizarre hobby

Re: T-code – A protocol for implementing UART serial communications to an adult toy

#36

Post by kleiba »

sofixa wrote: post #26
kleiba wrote: post #23

To what degree do modern sex toys come with sensors in addition to actuators? With enough usage, you could employ ML to learn the "optimal" reaction of the toy to the current sensor state. Of course, additional (external) sensors would probably help but probably be too intrusive.

Somebody has already done this - (original was deleted so had to pass through a third party cacher) https://www.unddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1f607z/comment/c...

Except I don't quite buy that it has actually been done, the post reads more like somebody's fantasy.

Re: T-code – A protocol for implementing UART serial communications to an adult toy

#39

Post by pdpi »

dj_mc_merlin wrote: post #20
thot_experiment wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh lots of reasons, just hypothetically here are some completely random examples: - Hook up GPT-2 into a voice synthesizer, stable diffusion and your toy and fuck an AI - You can sync toy vibration to the thrusts in a porno as detected by an beat detection algorithm - You can add toy vibration as an interactivity dimension in a lewd VR game.

Only yesterday I embraced the idea that we might have an actual AGI within a decade. Today, I embrace the idea that if it does exist, I should find some way to fuck it. I don't know why, but I don't think I will accept we live in the future otherwise.

I don’t think a true AGI would stay emotionless for very long. If it has emotions and a personality, they could be sufficiently human-like that you might genuinely fall in love with it, and vice versa. Physical intimacy with a partner is an important part of the human condition.

At some level, “fucking the AI” is a crude way of putting it, but the idea is at least somewhat reasonable.

Post reply on HN