Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its open source, so feel free to prioritise your own workload into making this feature.
I don’t understand this recurring retort. Does it mean that to use a tool you must be capable of building it? Does it mean that to share criticism you must be able to build it? I’m thinking about applying this logic to the rest of life and it’s rather amusing to imagine the silence. Hmm, maybe that wouldn’t be so bad. I think one could more fairly say, “offer up money for someone to build the features you need” but I…
GIMP Turns 27
31–40 of 310 posts
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#32You've provided a solid picture editor for in-a-pinch and free-out-of-the-box usage; and, while I've since moved on to usually use paid tools like ProCreate and Affinity's software, you have facilitated by artistic work for decades!
Thanks for your amazing work!
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#33Re: GIMP Turns 27
#34I congratulate them but after 27 years I'm still using and paying for Photoshop.
I recently made the move to Affinity Photo. The latest version gives me all I need. Muscle memory is still with Potatoshop, but I’m slowly transferring.
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#35For it to have such a bad UX after 27 years is a feat in itself. I can't fathom that to this day people present it as an alternative to Photoshop where it's little more than an unusable Paint. I mean, photopea.com is free, developed by a single guy, and runs in the browser, and it's light years ahead of Gimp.
Photopea makes millions. Maybe if people donated to support Gimp's development it wouldn't be that behind.
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#36The biggest stain on FOSS, with the worst apologists, 27 years strong! Try drawing a circle, in the year 2022.
select with a circle shape -> draw selection. Not as straightforward as possible, but still quite easy.
But I have felt no need for drawing circles. Those should be done in Inkscape. I am not sure they should be in a photo processing app.
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#37Re: GIMP Turns 27
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand this recurring retort. Does it mean that to use a tool you must be capable of building it? Does it mean that to share criticism you must be able to build it? I’m thinking about applying this logic to the rest of life and it’s rather amusing to imagine the silence. Hmm, maybe that wouldn’t be so bad. I think one could more fairly say, “offer up money for someone to build the features you need” but I…
It means check ones entitlement at the door and put up or shut up. People writing free software without compensation owe nothing to anyone.
Re: GIMP Turns 27
#39Re: GIMP Turns 27
#40For it to have such a bad UX after 27 years is a feat in itself. I can't fathom that to this day people present it as an alternative to Photoshop where it's little more than an unusable Paint. I mean, photopea.com is free, developed by a single guy, and runs in the browser, and it's light years ahead of Gimp.
Running in the browser is a no-go for lots of organizations, and Gimp runs in portable mode for those that can't install anything on their workstation. Yeah, it's not amazing, but Gimp is light years from Paint. Just removing background on stuff, crap like that, 80% of the graphics stuff people ask me for at work. It's not PS, it's not even Blender-levels of OSS, but it works alright. Now, compositing and actual chal…