Live data from Hacker News

After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

livelaw.in

31–40 of 230 posts

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#31

Quoted post unavailable.

The downvotes indicate you shouldn't be expressing this opinion on this site in this manner. There's a reason why. You shouldn't do it again.

This incident has been noted for future reference.

Thank you for your cooperation. Have a nice day!

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#32
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pavel Durov seems to be proud of never having disclosed user data to authorities and mentions it every time he disses another messenger. Guess he can't do that anymore now. (Just to clarify: I like Telegram. I just don't like Durov very much and the way he positions Telegram as the superior messenger in every way, even though it obviously isn't when it comes to encryption in particular.)

It is not the first case for Telegram. So, Durov will continue with his show... they claim that Telegram is e2e encrypted, but don't mention that needs to be activated per chat

I'm a little bit sad because I'm sure if they invested some effort into it, they could make all chats e2e encrypted while still allowing sync with their server. They "just" need to figure out a way to safely exchange the private key between devices. I know it's not completely trivial, but if anyone could create a good user experience for this, it's certainly Telegram.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#33
post #14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TLDR don't use Telegram and Signal as some "alternatives" Use Matrix clients (Element, Fluffy chat) or Session, Briar (no (video)calls), Delta (no (video)calls), Jami, not recommending Threema because they can tie you through payment and it's centralized Here simple chart to see what to use and not use (use translate feature): https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix.html

Signal is the most secure messaging app out there.

Signal requires a phone number which is linked to identity and precise location.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#34
post #2

Don't use messengers that ask for your phone number and aren't end-to-end encrypted. Use services that store as little data as possible. If data is stored, it can be given away and I would assume that it will be given away. Telegram disguises itself as encrypted chat app, when it is actually just a regular centralized plaintext messenger that has an encryption feature that nobody uses.

So that basically means don't use any messenger.

There are options. Matrix, Session, Threema, Wire...

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#35
post #2

Don't use messengers that ask for your phone number and aren't end-to-end encrypted. Use services that store as little data as possible. If data is stored, it can be given away and I would assume that it will be given away. Telegram disguises itself as encrypted chat app, when it is actually just a regular centralized plaintext messenger that has an encryption feature that nobody uses.

So that basically means don't use any messenger.

No, most. Like Signal for example. Even without security you can't migrate between android and iphone or have multiple devices with the same account. But they have crypto amd stories now lol.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#37
post #14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TLDR don't use Telegram and Signal as some "alternatives" Use Matrix clients (Element, Fluffy chat) or Session, Briar (no (video)calls), Delta (no (video)calls), Jami, not recommending Threema because they can tie you through payment and it's centralized Here simple chart to see what to use and not use (use translate feature): https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix.html

Signal is the most secure messaging app out there.

It is not. Session and Matrix alone use the same protocol Signal uses without needing your phone number or google play services.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#38
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So that basically means don't use any messenger.

No, most. Like Signal for example. Even without security you can't migrate between android and iphone or have multiple devices with the same account. But they have crypto amd stories now lol.

*after giving them your phone number and everyone you want to message and the entire social graph from anybody with your number stored in their device's contacts list

F, for Failure

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#39
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Use Matrix clients (Element, Fluffy chat) or Session, Briar... With those other clients you mention, one of the reasons your communications will remain secure is that --because so few people use them-- you'll struggle to find anyone to message, in the first place.

Sure, but in that case you can just go with Whatsapp and Facebook Messenger with WA being at least E2E by default, no point even trying some "alternatives" as Signal or Telegram under pretense of security. With Telegram I can see at least appeal in using it as news source, chat room or for bots, but what offers Signal besides hype about The Current Thing? Signal uses centralized server with closed source (they hidden…

  >With Telegram I can see at least appeal in using it as news source, chat room or for bots, but what offers Signal besides hype about The Current Thing?...
I use Telegram as a less 'facebooky' alternative to WhatsApp. Most of my friends and all my family are on it and, as a convenient messenger, it has a lot going for it; fast, 100% reliable sync across all my devices, generous file transfers, ability to quickly ping someone your location, ability to set up and subscribe to channels, etc. etc.

It also has some infuriatingly shite 'features' such as the fact that one party in a conversation can delete messages from the other party's device and [as is oft-mentioned] the fact that comms are not E2E encrypted by default. But, on the whole, I reckon it's the best all-round messenger app out there. Just so long as you're not under any illusion that your comms are in any way secure.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#40

Quoted post unavailable.

> What's your threat model that you can't use conventional channels to communicate stuff? If you shouldn't be saying it, don't say it. If you're being censored, perhaps there's a reason why.

What an incredibly (western) privileged thing to say. LGBTQ people and oppressed women need secure channels to protect their lives. Protestors need secure channels to free themselves of censorship and an oppressive regime.

Grow up. Maybe you‘re not as versed as you think if you‘ve not yet recognized the absolute evil of state actors.

Post reply on HN