Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

codeberg.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 82 posts

Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

#31

Post by ViViDboarder »

joencott wrote: post #10
TheBrokenRail wrote: post #4

While the seeming lack of communication from the Gitea owners (see the Gitea open letter) is a bit worrying, it does seem a bit premature to fork and potentially fragment the community before they've actually done anything.

Today the for-profit company released a code dump for the implementation of an integrated CI/CD server. This was worked on in secret for months by multiple people with no say from the community. Gitea should work with Woodpecker for closer integration, not build one by itself. There is no incentive for the company to support alternative CI/CD

Sorry, why should they work with Woodpecker? I like the project, but options are generally good. For example, Why work on Woodpecker? Why not Jenkins?

Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

#34

Post by joencott »

ViViDboarder wrote: post #31
joencott wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Today the for-profit company released a code dump for the implementation of an integrated CI/CD server. This was worked on in secret for months by multiple people with no say from the community. Gitea should work with Woodpecker for closer integration, not build one by itself. There is no incentive for the company to support alternative CI/CD

Sorry, why should they work with Woodpecker? I like the project, but options are generally good. For example, Why work on Woodpecker? Why not Jenkins?

It is easy to use, and Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD

Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

#35

Post by joencott »

rjzzleep wrote: post #32

Well-being and moderation teams were already created. Must be a VERY vibrant community. There is a section for what does Forgejo offer but what does it offer that gitea does not?

Forgejo is owned by an independent community instead of a for-profit company, and promises to be free/libre forever!

Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

#36

Post by archerx »

This is interesting but does codeberg dictate what projects are acceptable? From this post it seems that codeberg has an authoritarian vibe to the point where you can produce “wrong code”;

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794#issuecomm...

If that is the case I’ll stick with my self hosted gitlab.

Re: Forgejo – Launching a Fork of Gitea

#40

Post by joencott »

archerx wrote: post #36

This is interesting but does codeberg dictate what projects are acceptable? From this post it seems that codeberg has an authoritarian vibe to the point where you can produce “wrong code”; https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794#issuecomm... If that is the case I’ll stick with my self hosted gitlab.

A platform needs to be moderated, and I support Codeberg. Ddevault and SourceHut already banned all cryptocurrency-related projects.
Post reply on HN