31–40 of 86 posts
Bugzilla is still one of the best, change my mind :D A simple list is a pretty good solution IMO.
At least it doesn't suck as much as Bugzilla. Apparently you can only get "loads fast" or "is usable" and not both. But when in doubt, I'll choose usable.
Same with confluence, I don't mind if the editor takes a minute to start up, but why reading the page takes like 10sec?
Don't get me wrong, I can be as frustrated by Jira as the next person, but this is simply a rant fuelled by the writer's anger at internal processes as much as the software itself.
Additionally, the numbers on data usage and network requests do not align with what I see.
It's just a couple of fair points surrounded by populist "yucky Jira" fluff.
The issue isn't Jira; it's the question: Does Jira work for you, or do you work for Jira?
Huge machines capable of doing everything.
As a result, unable to do anything particularly well.
Bloated, expensive and only still in business because decision makers know the names and the vendor lock-in is huge.
Is anyone using a reasonable jira client?
Yes I have a project manager that operates it for me.
We do all of our issues in gitlab, and PM deals with jira, which is required by corp.
Kind of like in the olden days when corp required clearcase, so we did our work in git and used rsync to put stuff in clearcase once in a while.
For a company worth a small fortune Atlassian are totally incapable of designing good products. Since they acquired Trello I’ve watched them slowly but surely overcomplicate the interface making the product less intuitive.
> a company worth a small fortune Atlassian Atlassian market cap: 52 billion USD > a small fortune > small What.