Live data from Hacker News

https://16777217/

1.0.0.1

31–40 of 90 posts

Re: https://16777217/

#33

You can also try my tool online which obfuscate an ip address. https://wannabe1337.xyz/text-ipobfuscator

Is there a legitimate reason why to obfuscate an ip address?

I'd suggest - SPAM.

For example, I use the presence of IPs in the URL as a SPAM signal. If one used such an obfuscated URL, they could avoid some of the SPAM filters.

Re: https://16777217/

#36
Warp bypassed government blocked sites in my country (the UK - which blocks RT.com as part of war efforts).

I'm not sure how long they'll be able to run such a service till the government tells them they have to implement site blocking.

Re: https://16777217/

#38

Is there any good reason to support this notation for URLs? Do you think this format would be faster to parse than regular IPs?

Nah, pretty sure it's pure netops wankery. I like it though.

Re: https://16777217/

#40
post #22

$ man 3 inet_aton […] inet_aton() converts the Internet host address cp from the IPv4 numbers-and-dots notation into binary form (in network byte order) and stores it in the structure that inp points to. inet_aton() returns nonzero if the address is valid, zero if not. The address supplied in cp can have one of the following forms: a.b.c.d Each of the four numeric parts specifies a byte of the address; the bytes are…

This is just a convention from BSD, and is not even POSIX compliant. However, 'ping 1.1' is a convenient shortcut (actually pings 1.0.0.1). iproute2 and systemd do not use inet_aton and don't follow this BSD4.2 convention and instead parse it as '1.1.0.0' or not at all.
Post reply on HN