I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.
Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
31–40 of 287 posts
Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#32The article's title is "Showing off your status and wealth makes you seem less co-operative", and the title here on HN is absolutely wrong. I like wearing flashy clothes myself, and I would even say it has proven advantageous to cooperation in my line of work, so I was curious about this article. However, nowhere is it stated that flashy clothes make people less likely to cooperate with you. They say wearing clothes…
Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#33Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#34I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.
I’d offer that those wearing advertising logos on their clothing don’t have much understanding of fashion. Frankly, it’s vulgar.
Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#35Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#36Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#37You’ll have an outfit that looks sharp, and you can avoid a lot of the “$200 plain shirt with a logo” bullshit.
Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#38I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.
I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Uniqlo
More than 80% of my wardrobe is from Uniqlo, including 10 dry pique polos, 20 supima cotton tees, and 10 flannel button ups, all black. Makes getting dressed in the morning stress-free because I know I'm going to like how I look every day. The blacks do not fade — I have 5-year-old shirts that look practically as good as 6-month-old ones.
Their jeans, especially their selvedge jeans, are also high quality and priced well. Same for my winter parka, vests, fleeces, shorts, socks, underwear.
Best part: nary a logo in sight.
Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#39Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you
#40I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.
Except for sneakers, I can't think of a single category of clothing where it is common to have visible logos?