Was this really essential to research now. The conspiracy nutters are going to eat this right up.
Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration
#32There was a conspiracy theory about this. It was suppressed as a nonsense and miss information. I really find it very difficult to trust official authorities any more.
Was there any evidence at that time to support the conspiracy theory?
Re: Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration
#33Why the scare quotes around "temporarily" in the HN title? The study shows that the change was transient, and its title does not include quotation marks. Putting scare quotes around the word "temporarily" is both unjustified and misleading.
i copied it directly from disclosetv, who had it like that
Re: Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration
#34There was a conspiracy theory about this. It was suppressed as a nonsense and miss information. I really find it very difficult to trust official authorities any more.
Was there any evidence at that time to support the conspiracy theory?
Yes, there was. There were early studies in rats showing that the lipid nanoparticles which the mRNA vaccines use concentrate in the ovaries and testes. There should have been biodistribution studies in humans before the vaccine rollout, but naturally those were skipped entirely. It was one of the biggest early red flags for me.
Re: Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration
#35Why the scare quotes around "temporarily" in the HN title? The study shows that the change was transient, and its title does not include quotation marks. Putting scare quotes around the word "temporarily" is both unjustified and misleading.
Forget the scare quotes, that isn't even the fucking title.