RIP Oxide computer company. Cantrill's productivity is about to go to zero for a while.
What’s the relation?
31–40 of 40 posts
RIP Oxide computer company. Cantrill's productivity is about to go to zero for a while.
What’s the relation?
What are some precious information in ACM.org that is not possible to get another place? I mean in this age where everything is so public. Or not? I used to have a 1 year free access to all of ACM resources. This was a gift. But I did not to anything. Maybe I lost an opportunity.
If anyone is curious, here’s the previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31447465 “ACM Digital Library Archive is Open Access with 50 Years of Published Records” (acm.org) 473 points by yarapavan 23 days ago | 51 comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30944881
ACM Opens First 50 Years Backfile
177 points by mitchbob 66 days ago | 49 commentsRIP Oxide computer company. Cantrill's productivity is about to go to zero for a while.
[0] http://dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2008/07/18/revisiting-the-intel-...
Anyone else's company's employment agreement prevent them from join a standards body without permission?
Nope. I've even had them pay my membership costs for ACM and IEEE and various SIGs or Societies within them. Why wouldn't they want you to participate, even passively, in these organizations?
RIP Oxide computer company. Cantrill's productivity is about to go to zero for a while.
> RIP Oxide computer company. Cantrill's productivity is about to go to zero for a while. What’s the relation?
Bryan, if you're reading this, I'm not a stalker. Apparently being accused of making a "submarine post" makes for a thorough reply, from me at least, even never having heard the term before.
[0] https://paperswelove.org/2016/video/bryan-cantrill-jails-and-solaris-zones/
[1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1052676.1052707
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjVkCfgsLQ4]
incidentally, if anyone knows how to get hn to put my citations on separate lines without indenting do let me know, I tried a few different markdownisms but this was the best I could do.Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope. I've even had them pay my membership costs for ACM and IEEE and various SIGs or Societies within them. Why wouldn't they want you to participate, even passively, in these organizations?
Because they do not want you to submit their proprietary tech as an open standard. In the extreme, think about submitting .NET to ECMA. Something lighter might be a proprietary image format or interchange method. Engineers may find this useful. It may be at the request of a significant customer. It may even be in the best interest of the company. It does not mean senior management will agree though.
Anyone else's company's employment agreement prevent them from join a standards body without permission?
Nope. I've even had them pay my membership costs for ACM and IEEE and various SIGs or Societies within them. Why wouldn't they want you to participate, even passively, in these organizations?