31–40 of 198 posts
Loved the David Lynch ones. I'm disappointed the image it generated for Eraserhead[1] didn't have Kermit as the baby[2]. I'm curious as to what it would generate for "Kermit the Frog in David Lynch's Dune". [1]: https://twitter.com/HvnsLstAngel/status/1531774195234791424?... [2]: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=eraserhead+baby&iax=images&...
DALL-E would just shoot back a still with Kyle McLachlan in it. He's already so Kermit like!
I don’t understand how this isn’t infringing some copyright. Anyone do any research on this? If we accept that a model trained on copyright material does not infringe on the materials rights, then circumventing all copyright can be as simple as creating a sufficiently close derivative and giving it away. Not to say that copyright is good to begin with.
That's correct. People do this all the time, sans the giving it away part.
Also, there is no way that you can argue these images are not transformative.
These are honestly not very impressive (no sarcasm here) and further convince me that the next AI Winter will come with this coming recession. Don't get me wrong, they are still impressive in the quality of the visual they produce, but just like Markov Chain demos of old, they're neat but way miss the mark. None of these capture the "feel" of Kermit the Frog. Most of them look like weird designs for the Ninja Turtles…
These are mind bogglingly good
If you ran it 1000 times and picked the best, you might get all good ones. I would want to see all 1000. It's like stock picker ads (person who called the market says XXX) where you only show the lucky ones.
If this is legit it would be one of the most impressive things I've seen in many years.
? Dale is a legit project from openAI
- Were the prompts shown the ones fed to DALL-E 2 or were there more complex details described in the prompt?
- Were these the first images generated for the prompt, or did the author generate many images and cherry-pick the best example, and if so from how many?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
? Dale is a legit project from openAI
That doesn't mean the images in this tweet thread are output from Dalle though… Although if an individual created all of these then that's about the same amount of impressive
I don’t understand how this isn’t infringing some copyright. Anyone do any research on this? If we accept that a model trained on copyright material does not infringe on the materials rights, then circumventing all copyright can be as simple as creating a sufficiently close derivative and giving it away. Not to say that copyright is good to begin with.
>circumventing all copyright can be as simple as creating a sufficiently close derivative and giving it away. That's correct. People do this all the time, sans the giving it away part. Also, there is no way that you can argue these images are not transformative.
Exactly. Kermit has been very much transformed, and "in the style of" is not copyright infringement AFAIK.
I don’t understand how this isn’t infringing some copyright. Anyone do any research on this? If we accept that a model trained on copyright material does not infringe on the materials rights, then circumventing all copyright can be as simple as creating a sufficiently close derivative and giving it away. Not to say that copyright is good to begin with.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn’t matter if these images were one in 10,000, the facts that any exist that are this good is crazy.
Yeah exactly. The fact that a person who could never create such a picture on their own, now just has to go through a bunch of images and select one to get this result is already amazing. The goal posts keep shifting, glass half empty.