Live data from Hacker News

Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

reuters.com

31–40 of 430 posts

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#31

Do these type of transactions ever end up well for either the acquirer or the acquired company?

I think Trello and Atlassian went well (massively different scale, though). I think the rep is that Atlassian mainly does well by leaving the companies alone as independent organizations, more like investment positions rather than actually merging the tech.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#32

Do these type of transactions ever end up well for either the acquirer or the acquired company?

The more important question is whether these type of acquisitions end up well for the customer or the employees. And in that case, I think the answer is rarely yes.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#33
post #4

Oh no https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/uxucz4/if_vm...

It's relevant that they are talking about VMware's security portfolio.

The vast majority of why people are VMware proponents is down to their virtualisation software. It's why we were big resellers for a while. But for the last few years, their own sales people have only wanted to talk about security products, quite plainly acknowledging stagnant growth in on premise virtualisation.

But virtualisation is in my view the only place they've made it big. You've just linked a Reddit post in /r/cybersecurity talking about security products and every reply is about how to replace ESXi. It'll be interesting to see how their future pans out.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#35

Can we like... stop building these ginormous conglomerates? Thanks.

If intellectual property (specifically software patents) were weakened, this would be less of a problem, right?

Companies don't buy companies, they buy IP, as I understand it.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#37
Ponders if it will payoff as an investment. Hyper visors are nowdays commodity. Workloads are moving from enterprise onsite datacenters to the cloud. Hyperscalers AWS,Google and Azure running the cloud are running work loads on Linux KVM kernel based virtual machines.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#38
post #21

If they invested instead a mere Billion into optimizing a fork of e.g. QEMU they would destroy VMware in performance.

This isn’t about the hypervisor. This is about the enterprise sales. A bank isn’t going to run their data center on qemu, regardless of the performance. They are going to go with the company that can sell them support contracts with dedicated engineers to answer the phone.

> They are going to go with the company that can sell them support contracts with dedicated engineers to answer the phone.

There's no reason the company selling them support couldn't be providing support for QEMU btw. If it met their needs otherwise I'm sure they'd consider it.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#39

I gather they own Symantec as well, how did that go for them? $61bn is a full price to be paying at this stage of the market.

I've no idea how well the Symantec acquisition worked for Broadcom, but it was particularly painful for anyone using Symantec products.

The ordering/renewal process was so messed up by the transition that for approximately 18 months it was almost impossible to get a quote or place an order, even to renew an existing subscription, long enough that Symantec started just giving out subscription extensions to tide people over until the order process worked again.

Re: Broadcom to acquire VMware for $61B

#40

Do these type of transactions ever end up well for either the acquirer or the acquired company?

Yes. See Oracle. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ORCL/oracle/market...

Not fair to compare software companies to a law firm.
Post reply on HN