A tech company in Bellevue Washington with a "shadowy and illusory "peer review" system" - this is Valve we're talking about, right? (fits his Twitter bio)
https://www.pcgamer.com/ex-valve-employee-describes-ruthless...
31–40 of 194 posts
A tech company in Bellevue Washington with a "shadowy and illusory "peer review" system" - this is Valve we're talking about, right? (fits his Twitter bio)
https://www.pcgamer.com/ex-valve-employee-describes-ruthless...
I don't get why you need to sabotage others? Does your bonus size shrink if others get a bonus or something?
yes. that’s pretty typical. managers get a lump sum to distribute among the team, at least at Apple.
This is unrelated to "tech" people. It's a common trope for shows about bankers, attorneys, consultants, etc.
This seems like a potentially self-destructive way to accomplish this. Not sure what company he is referring to, but at all I have worked at, this would be filed as a bug report and a quick git blame tells you all you need to know. Over time, if your name keeps coming up in that commit log, you'll get a bad reputation and your code in particular will acquire a smell ("Oh Bob, wrote this code... better be careful here," etc.)
A tech company in Bellevue Washington with a "shadowy and illusory "peer review" system" - this is Valve we're talking about, right? (fits his Twitter bio)
Just coming to say that - he's not the best at keeping things secret lol.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
yes. that’s pretty typical. managers get a lump sum to distribute among the team, at least at Apple.
All those managers seem to think it's a good enough motivator to keep it around.
The only bonus I have ever received which didn’t make me feel scummy was profit-sharing. Most companies don’t do it because profit is for the owners. Everything else just feels like a way to decide whether or not to pay me what I’m worth after I’ve already done the work