Free JSON API to instantly check the spam score of your email messages

Post by brdrak » Sat, Oct 15, 2011, 12:00 AM UTC

jimktrains2 wrote: post #26

brdrak wrote: post #23

This is very interesting, but I can't figure out how to use this in Bash, when I try: xargs -I % curl -X POST "http://sa-api.postmarkapp.com/filter \ -H "Accept: application/json" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -v \ -d '{"email":"%", "options":"long"}' \ It seems contents of my email message file are processed one line at a time, instead of the entire message passed in place of % I'm using GNU bash, version…

Please, man xargs if you aren't joking. EDIT: Sorry if that came off harsh.

Post by brdrak » Sat, Oct 15, 2011, 12:36 AM UTC

jimktrains2 wrote: post #32

brdrak wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I'm not joking. I guess I'm just really dense. I've also tried passing -L 100 in addition to -I, but the result is the same.

Why are you using xargs to read to an entire entry? Why not set it as a var and place it in the comment or take it as stdin?

   msg=$(cat message)
   curl -X POST "http://sa-api.postmarkapp.com/filter" \
    -H "Accept: application/json" \
    -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    -v \
    -d '{"email":"'"$msg"'", "options":"long"}'

Post by brdrak » Sat, Oct 15, 2011, 1:34 AM UTC

orenmazor wrote: post #34

brdrak wrote: post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've also tried this: msg=$(cat message) curl -X POST "http://sa-api.postmarkapp.com/filter" \ -H "Accept: application/json" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -v \ -d '{"email":"'"$msg"'", "options":"long"}' But sa-api.postmarkapp.com returns "error"... :-(

oh no. I'm sorry! that's the previous url which we moved last minute. I'm going to go through the doc again to make sure there's nothing else out of place :/

Post by duck » Sat, Oct 15, 2011, 3:01 AM UTC

Post by manuscreationis » Sat, Oct 15, 2011, 12:45 PM UTC

efedorenko wrote: post #12

manuscreationis wrote: post #7

Would you consider putting some kind of resource on the site for explaining some of the common results? For example, why the Text to Image ratio matters. Also, I've tried a few emails: 1 of them ranked a 1.0, 2 of them a 0.4, but all three times the little white dot was in the same position (at about 2:50, if it were the face of a clock). Not sure if thats a bug or not.

SpamAssassin score could be in range from -1 (best) to 25 (worst). 0.4 and 1.0 is almost the same, so it's normal for white pointer to stay on the same position.