The article contradicts its hypey headline: To be sure, the Bay Area has such a deep reservoir of tech talent, money and infrastructure, not to mention the climate and the ocean, that it won’t be easily knocked off its perch.
Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
31–40 of 43 posts
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#32Edit: As a poor proxy, checking the most recent 200 levels.fyi entries for ", CA |" finds 37 entries when I checked, vs 12 for TX. Wikipedia says the San Francisco CSA has 9 million people, vs 2.2 million for the Austin MSA. There's lots of issues with that analysis (first, I think CA programmers are more concentrated than TX programmers), but to my surprise, it implies the the bay has more programmers, but Austin has more programmers per capita?
Do people have suggestions for better data, or better analyses of data?
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
> academic institutions like Stanford and Berkeley, and dare I say politics. For various reasons, including the rather diverse nature of tech workforce due to a substantial number of immigrants and even otherwise, the tech workforce is generally liberal or are at least centrist moderate. Texas is not an ideal home for most of them.
No way. As a person of "overrepresented in tech" color, Austin is WAY friendlier to non-whites than California ever was. I regularly see groups of "bros" walking around/hanging out/eating out in interracial groups, which I would never see in the bay. There are LOTS of immigrants here, as well, though not as many as in Cali, but nothing to sneeze at. And finally if Mexico can get its act together and (some city there)…
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#34I’ve lived all over n America and I can’t see it. It would beat “no other alternative” but that’s about it.
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#35My understanding is that a major reason why the Bay Area became the tech hub it did is because of academic institutions like Stanford and Berkeley, which in turn led to commercial enterprises like HP, Shockley, and Fairchild. From there, it was like dandelion seeds in the wind, with alumni from those companies going on to found AMD, Kleiner Perkins, Xerox PARC, etc. It seems to me that, until UT Austin catches up wit…
> academic institutions like Stanford and Berkeley, and dare I say politics. For various reasons, including the rather diverse nature of tech workforce due to a substantial number of immigrants and even otherwise, the tech workforce is generally liberal or are at least centrist moderate. Texas is not an ideal home for most of them.
And the hilarious part is how insular the Bay Area is - home of the "fly over city" mentality.
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
No way. As a person of "overrepresented in tech" color, Austin is WAY friendlier to non-whites than California ever was. I regularly see groups of "bros" walking around/hanging out/eating out in interracial groups, which I would never see in the bay. There are LOTS of immigrants here, as well, though not as many as in Cali, but nothing to sneeze at. And finally if Mexico can get its act together and (some city there)…
I can see that, however the issue is Texas state laws apply to Austin. So you aren't exactly shielded.for example : In Texas, abortions are now banned as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. Known as SB 8, the new law represents the nation’s most restrictive ban on the procedure currently in effect. According to a recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist national poll, Texas’ law is unpopular across the political spectrum. ( h…
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#37Nothing lasts forever.
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can see that, however the issue is Texas state laws apply to Austin. So you aren't exactly shielded.for example : In Texas, abortions are now banned as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. Known as SB 8, the new law represents the nation’s most restrictive ban on the procedure currently in effect. According to a recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist national poll, Texas’ law is unpopular across the political spectrum. ( h…
I get it, but wouldn't things like Asia hate crimes, unchecked shoplifting and corruption in city hall have a bigger impact on someone's life than an abortion law that will likely get struck down?
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> academic institutions like Stanford and Berkeley, and dare I say politics. For various reasons, including the rather diverse nature of tech workforce due to a substantial number of immigrants and even otherwise, the tech workforce is generally liberal or are at least centrist moderate. Texas is not an ideal home for most of them.
You realize Austin is one of the most liberal cities in Texas? And the hilarious part is how insular the Bay Area is - home of the "fly over city" mentality.
Re: Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
The list was examples, and not exhaustive. It's also true in Arizona, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, and probably a bunch of other states that I'm less familiar with. My point stands, though. The Texas thing is still a stereotype, and still at least a decade out of date.
> The Texas thing is still a stereotype Look into the latest abortion law, and voting law charges and statements from Texan politicians and …