Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suggest this tiny thing named "key" is an appropriate solution. Hard to break through dropping, no battery, the home doesn't need electricity and so on. While I understand the tinkering here for fun, the author did ignored the actual problem of the drained battery completely?
I shared this elsewhere but I could have expressed the initial problem a little clearer, which actually was "enter my home without unlocking my phone which causes my phone to die in the cold." Unlocking the screen caused the battery to drop immediately - it still had network connectivity prior to that.
Event-driven access to my home after a run
31–40 of 84 posts
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#32Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#33Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#34This is awesome! I love reading about projects like this. Always gets me thinking about how I can do little things like this for my life workflows. > installing MyQ W-Fi connected garage doors Haha you were already light-years ahead of me before you even started. I typically slide my key into a little pocket and pray it doesn't fall out. I think using events from your router is a great idea. I have recently been play…
[0] https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Us...
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#35This is awesome! I love reading about projects like this. Always gets me thinking about how I can do little things like this for my life workflows. > installing MyQ W-Fi connected garage doors Haha you were already light-years ahead of me before you even started. I typically slide my key into a little pocket and pray it doesn't fall out. I think using events from your router is a great idea. I have recently been play…
my little pocket has a zipper to prevent things from falling out.
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#36Automating such a narrow edge-case seems totally pointless. A much more likely scenario is that your battery dies while you're out, in which case you're still screwed. A better tried-and-tested real world solution that covers all scenarios is a simple key safe.
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I shared this elsewhere but I could have expressed the initial problem a little clearer, which actually was "enter my home without unlocking my phone which causes my phone to die in the cold." Unlocking the screen caused the battery to drop immediately - it still had network connectivity prior to that.
I think the initial problem was clearly-enough stated, and the GP's point is valid - why bother accounting for the case where your phone is so close to dying that you can't unlock the screen, when just a bit less battery life would mean that your phone dies regardless (and you're stuck outside anyways)?
For me, this was just a matter of convenience and not optimizing for most resilient or reliable solution. I do have backup plans for home entry.
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#38Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#39Second: I'm probably missing something, but:
Therefore, I would at least need to start a process
that would understand my intent to leave
How did you solve the "intent" issue? It looks like your solution simply detects when your phone stops responding to pings, and then unlocks the doors when it resumes.This doesn't seem like it would distinguish between "going for a run", "going on a car trip", "turning the phone off for 10 minutes and then back on again, but never leaving the house," etc.
I suppose one (fun, overkill, probably) solution would be if the phone's sensors could be queried. Once the phone "returns", your home network could query the phone and ask it if you've been exercising or not, based on your heartrate/motion since the phone was last seen by the network.
Re: Event-driven access to my home after a run
#40My feelings about these kinds of projects are a bit mixed. I certainly understand why, writing code that controls something in the real world is so much fun. However I actively avoid any kind of smart device in my home, beyond my vacuum cleaner. Having a computer control lighting, heating or access to my home is out of the question, I simply don't want to deal with it. I trust keys, switches and knobs.
Dumb solution: hiding place for a key. Paradoxically it may be safer than smart solutions :)
You also have to be careful to get one that suits your threat model, a key custody safe designed to be installed in a semi-secure part of a building may not be resistant enough when mounted on the exterior with street access - many are only designed to resist covert tampering and are not that strong against a determined attacker with an angle grinder or similar overt attack.
[1] something like this: https://www.safeguardsafes.com.au/product/cmi-class-b-key-cu... - includes a very nice Kaba X-10 lock that is kinetically powered so you don't have to worry about wiring it to mains power or changing batteries.