Live data from Hacker News

Apple in 2021

sixcolors.com

31–40 of 105 posts

Re: Apple in 2021

#31

I have to believe that HomeKit has fallen so far to the wayside due to their work on Matter. And we can expect something big in the near future. Right? Please?

Here's hoping. In the meantime, I've had a ton of fun making small ESP devices that integrate with Homebridge. It's really opened up so many possibilities, even beyond the things that Homebridge is typically praised for.

Re: Apple in 2021

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It didn’t used to be this way. Apple software used to be functional, intuitive, and fun in a lot of cases. Things went downhill rapidly when Jony Ive’s team took over software design. I wasn’t a huge fan of the gaudy extreme skeuomorphism of the late Forstall era, but at least you could tell what was a button. What you could do with a piece of software was much clearer. The current team are insistent that simplicity…

The "new folder" workflow in Finder is one of the most infuriating things I've ever seen in macOS. I swear, they used to just have a "new folder" button in the olden days.

It was really frustrating till I realized they didn't completely remove the button. The icon is just hidden in the customise toolbar options.

Re: Apple in 2021

#33
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a Likert scale is actually different than how they're surveying respondents in the article linked by the OP. From Wikipedia: "A Likert item is simply a statement that the respondent is asked to evaluate by giving it a quantitative value on any kind of subjective or objective dimension, with level of agreement/disagreement being the dimension most commonly used... The format of a typical five-level Likert item…

How do you know? I couldn't find any example questions in the article.

"They were prompted with 12 different Apple-related subjects, and asked to rate them on a scale from 1 to 5 and optionally provide text commentary per category"

Re: Apple in 2021

#34
post #28
post #6

I love the new Apple Silicon Macs, and the transition for me has been pretty easy. I can't imagine anything interesting happening to the watch that doesn't include a big increase to battery life. I don't want any other feature except a battery that can make it a full day. Apple software has seemingly regressed every year recently. Native apps like Music and Podcasts, the only two I would regularly use, have become so…

I don't think it'll ever happen, but it would be amazing if the opened up 3rd-party watch faces. For a watch, the watch-face is really the analog of the app, and it's a shame we're just limited to the built-in stuff.

Agreed, and given that I would be fine paying a few books for a watch face that seems like easy money Apple.

Re: Apple in 2021

#35

What is Apple doing with the iPad division? The Mac spanked the iPad in 2021 and the recent earnings showed that.

I think that has more to do with 2020/2021 being unusually good years for the Mac in particular. Computers in general have been selling well due to the pandemic, and the hype surrounding the move to ARM generated a lot of sales. Anecdotally I know a number of people who upgraded laptops earlier than they otherwise would have due to rave reviews of the M1.

Re: Apple in 2021

#36
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a feeling these things are heavily related to both WiFi (congestion/protocol/support for sleep & awake/distance to AP) and cellular (if enabled), in addition to other usage (like Bluetooth, including distance to host phone). This is also (educated) speculation.

Also device age. My Series 3 originally lasted about a day and a half but is under a full day now with a couple years of cycles on the battery.

Well of course battery age, but the GPs were talking about the latest watch, so I assumed it was more about battery life from the start.

From what I understand, impact of radio on battery life is very real but often invisible / not thought about. Cellular really can chew through battery when the base stations are far away.

Re: Apple in 2021

#37
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My series 7 easily makes it a full day, closer to two days. It also charges really quickly. I put it on the charger for about 30 mins to an hour in the morning while reading emails and it’s done.

Really? I may make it thru one day if I am using it moderately (mostly apple fitness).

My 3 year old Series 4 dies before 8pm, if it's fully charged at 7am, and with absolutely no use except standby. Some are still using Series 0s (with light use), but Apple Watches are disposable electronics by any reasonable definition, especially with battery replacements that cost as much as a new one.

Re: Apple in 2021

#38

What is Apple doing with the iPad division? The Mac spanked the iPad in 2021 and the recent earnings showed that.

There are apologists who will insist you can do real work on an iPad—if you get the iPad Pro, and the keyboard case.

Which ends up being about as expensive and about the same size as a MacBook Air. And for any work that requires any sort of interface density, or complete access to the file system, or fast I/O, or…I’d way rather have a Mac.

Re: Apple in 2021

#39
post #6

I love the new Apple Silicon Macs, and the transition for me has been pretty easy. I can't imagine anything interesting happening to the watch that doesn't include a big increase to battery life. I don't want any other feature except a battery that can make it a full day. Apple software has seemingly regressed every year recently. Native apps like Music and Podcasts, the only two I would regularly use, have become so…

> I can't imagine anything interesting happening to the watch that doesn't include a big increase to battery life. I don't want any other feature except a battery that can make it a full day.

I have to ask: What are you doing with your Apple Watch that drains the battery so fast?

I've never been able to drain my Watch battery anywhere near that fast, even with the always-on screen still enabled.

Re: Apple in 2021

#40
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also device age. My Series 3 originally lasted about a day and a half but is under a full day now with a couple years of cycles on the battery.

Well of course battery age, but the GPs were talking about the latest watch, so I assumed it was more about battery life from the start. From what I understand, impact of radio on battery life is very real but often invisible / not thought about. Cellular really can chew through battery when the base stations are far away.

IMO battery age is still part of the discussion when talking about the shiny new model. If I buy a Series 7, two years from now it's going to be two years old. That seems obvious but people seem to gloss right over it.

When the AirPods first came out there were a lot of reviews saying "Battery life is about 5 hours, this is just barely acceptable but it's not a problem."

And then two years later the same authors were writing articles complaining that their AirPod battery life has gotten unacceptably short as if they'd never owned anything with a non-removable battery before and had no idea it was going to happen.

Post reply on HN