Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you checked out the creators channel? What do you mean “misleading your audience”? It’s quite obvious to me that they are not a scientific awareness channel, and shouldn’t be treated like one.
I agree with you that they are not a scientific awareness channel, which in my opinion is exactly why this sort of thing should be censored because it is intentionally misleading. The author has the video re-posted, you can view it yourself.
YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
31–40 of 48 posts
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
HN is not turning into reddit, however there are some users that come to this site and treat it similarly. Sometimes a friendly "that's not the way we do things here" is appropriate for newcomers.
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fair point, but they should apply that standard uniformly. Wasn't the ice bucket challenge dangerous ? And it was literally dangerous.
Personally I think a video with drink acid in the title seems a little more dangerous than videos properly named with people pouring ice water on each other, especially for children.
like citric acid? you cant cure stupid by censoring thing they dont understand
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#34I'm just imagining the YouTube censors who have to watch a thousand videos a day (or whatever). They see "drinking acid", click ban, and hit next. It's a cute joke but understandable why it gets banned.
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ...doesn't really seem plausible to me when we have adults killing themselves with fish tank cleaner because they confuse it for anti-viral meds What actually happened is that a woman murdered her husband with fish tank cleaner, and blamed Trump for it. And the media ran with it because that was a much more sensational story. https://www.yahoo.com/now/woman-blamed-trump-giving-her-1336... No, 30 people did not die…
> Nor was Kyle Rittenhouse a "mass shooter" that ambushed innocent civil rights demonstrators. He did shoot some people with a high powered rifle in public though, which in most parts of the world is something that you wouldn't get acquitted for.
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
But drinking hydroxic acid is not stupid. I wish people drink more hydroxic acid. Would have been healthier. So, YouTube now bans a scientifically accurate video?
Youtube bans video titles which if misinterpreted might make people do harmful things, like say, confusing hydroxic acid with hydrochloric acid. They're not a scientific journal, they're a video platform serving a general audience. Please tell me you're just intentionally being obtuse and don't actually struggle with that point because this is a response I expect on reddit and not HN
Because I don't. They are obviously different spelling.
If people are confused by these two words, I have bad news for them. They might literally have brain problems.
> They're not a scientific journal, they're a video platform serving a general audience
So what? Are they not allowed to state anything that is scientifically accurate?
What next? We should ban non-scientific channel who says masks help?
> Youtube bans video titles which if misinterpreted might make people do harmful things
Anything that is misinterpreted will lead to harmful things. That's the consequence of misinterpretation.
Hacker News could be misinterpreted as a community of hackers trying to hack into people's computers. Therefore, we should close down the community?
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#37Another history channel I follow had their videos mass de-monetized and age restricted. It was purely educational nothing about the channel is remotely controversial. I am convinced YT is deliberately doing this to push out small content creators and replace them with corporate content creators that are fleeing the sinking ship that is cable TV.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SwimJim/status/148026868974841447...
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#38Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#39Who are all these YT defenders in the comments? "Well, it says ACID, and as every ignorant person knows, ACID means BAD, and knowing the difference between substances is stupid!" You sound like a bot trying to make common sense from adversarial policies. ThisCommonSenseIsFake.com.
Re: YouTube removed a vid of me drinking water because “it's dangerous”. I'm done
#40Another history channel I follow had their videos mass de-monetized and age restricted. It was purely educational nothing about the channel is remotely controversial. I am convinced YT is deliberately doing this to push out small content creators and replace them with corporate content creators that are fleeing the sinking ship that is cable TV.
I'm pretty sure their policies don't take channel size into account. Otherwise they wouldn't have nuked my favorite channel, JCS. Currently sitting at 4.7mil subscribers. https://mobile.twitter.com/SwimJim/status/148026868974841447...