Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love the scheme of repeatedly building up towards the answer to one of the central questions of the subject and then yanking the rug, digressing into some backstory of a minor personage or historic aside to pad out another page. And by love I mean absolutely despise.
What really gets me is how, in narrative fiction, the author knows what's going to happen in the plot at the very beginning, but they only gradually reveal it to the reader throughout the story.
Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
31–40 of 102 posts
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#32I gave up on the site when I realized that I was spending more time scrolling for something interesting than actually reading articles. Even now, out of their top 10 "best of 2021" I find only 3 of those even remotely interesting, and IMHO one of them is garbage (I read it when it came out).
The type of articles I like the most are those when someone takes a ridiculous amount of time to explain something mundane. The Guardian's article on what will happen when the Queen dies [1] is my go-to example of long form journalism done right. longform.org articles always felt more like "here's a sad story about some global issue", which is not the type of article I want to read during my commute.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/16/what-happens...
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#33Alternatives: Arts & Letters Daily : https://aldaily.com/ Aeon: https://aeon.co/ Nautilus: https://nautil.us/ Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#34Never heard of this site before, but if I could hazard a guess to why they're shutting down, who nowadays has the time to read a long text for leisure? Not many people I guess. My opinion is that the information loop has entered hyper velocity and anything long form cannot be mainstream anymore. If I take my case as an example, the only activity where I focus for more than 5 minutes is coding. I skim news just readin…
Really? The short story is now a dead artform. Even 'trilogies' aren't a thing anymore - anything less than five thick tomes doesn't sell. Movies are now three hours long, but even that seems to be a half-measure and the cinematic form is now being replaced by miniseries. (I remember when a 90 hour movie was considered long.)
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#35I am sorry to see them go, but more for the principle than for the site itself. I gave up on the site when I realized that I was spending more time scrolling for something interesting than actually reading articles. Even now, out of their top 10 "best of 2021" I find only 3 of those even remotely interesting, and IMHO one of them is garbage (I read it when it came out). The type of articles I like the most are those…
But filtering and discovering new things is somehow much more rewarding than reading or understanding itself.
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#36That's a shame. Fortunately, it looks like the archive will stay up: https://twitter.com/aaronlammer/status/1478749874053169154
This is now the chance to get to them and re-read the best ones, without being distracted by new things.
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#37I am sorry to see them go, but more for the principle than for the site itself. I gave up on the site when I realized that I was spending more time scrolling for something interesting than actually reading articles. Even now, out of their top 10 "best of 2021" I find only 3 of those even remotely interesting, and IMHO one of them is garbage (I read it when it came out). The type of articles I like the most are those…
I'm a fan of high-quality, significant, long-form, content.
I'm ... not really seeing that here. A few good pieces, but that's from their own self-admitted "best of".
If not necessarily an outright failure, then a mismatch of goals and attainment.
And as has been frequently noted on HN (occasionally by myself), length itself is not a marke of quality in writing. Requisite complexity is, that is, the structure of the piece itself should be suited and fitted to what it is it addresses. Longform wouldn't be the only place the false equivalence that "long" == "good" seems asserted. The New Yorker, which likewise has both a long legacy and recent history of producing good high-quality long pieces, also seems to fall far too frequently into the trap of mistaking length for quality.
I appreciate the effort and intent. I'm sorry to see the attempt failed. But execution was in fact lacking.
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#38I feel bad, I tried it but if I'm honest I couldn't focus on long form Not a good thing
TBH, a lot of "long form" articles are just shitty. Randomly interrupting a current event story with unrelated biographic episodes of the protagonists does not magically result in a more valuable, high-brow form of reporting.
Re: Longform.org is shutting down its article recommendations service
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love the scheme of repeatedly building up towards the answer to one of the central questions of the subject and then yanking the rug, digressing into some backstory of a minor personage or historic aside to pad out another page. And by love I mean absolutely despise.
What really gets me is how, in narrative fiction, the author knows what's going to happen in the plot at the very beginning, but they only gradually reveal it to the reader throughout the story.
State the fact and be done with it.
(As I've just done here.)
If the writing has value, the fact will be immaterial to that value, and the true reward for the reader is in the telling of the story, the narrative developed, the introduction and interrelation of facts, concepts, characters, strengths, and flaws. And yes, telling those, where they are material to the story, takes time, but also is its own constant reward.
We have classics of literature and mythology. The stories are well known. The boy loses the girl, then wins her back. The dog dies. We all die. A tree grows in Brooklyn. George slays the dragon. Cinderella wins the prince. The Wicked Witch is overcome. Jesus dies, then returns. Buddha is enlightened.
Those facts don't matter to the value of the story. It's the details built up along the way, the morals and principles exposed, which do.
Build your stories around those, then pull away all that truly does not matter.
(This sounds simple. It's much harder than it seems.)