Live data from Hacker News

North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

earthnutshell.com

31–40 of 72 posts

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Available evidence strongly suggests Trump and his campaign coordinated with representatives of Russian government interests that involved both significant lawbreaking and a targeted media campaign that resulted in a victory for Trump that would not have occurred otherwise. Whether that's semantically equivalent to "colluded with Putin to cheat in the election" I don't know. What you're saying, is itself an example o…

> Available evidence strongly suggests Trump and his campaign coordinated with representatives of Russian government interests that involved both significant lawbreaking and a targeted media campaign that resulted in a victory for Trump that would not have occurred otherwise. Whether that's semantically equivalent to "colluded with Putin to cheat in the election" I don't know.

The Mueller report disagrees. What available evidence exactly do you have which the special council investigation did not? Cite your sources please.

> What you're saying, is itself an example of propaganda, in the sense that it's a simplification that while technically true leads a reader to reach a different conclusion that what actually occurred. And it's easy to do, because reality is complicated while disinformation can be simple.

No it's not, what I am saying is almost verbatim from the Mueller report. No evidence was found implicating Trump or his campaign of colluding (conspiring) with Russians. I can dig out quotes from it verbatim or cite page numbers for you if you have not read it or disagree. EDIT: I have done so in another reply, if you are interested.

> No, Donald Trump did not sit down in a hotel or pick up a phone and directly conspire with Vladimir Putin to scheme about how to change vote totals.

Strawman, that is not what was being argued against.

> Here's what is known to have happened:

> Trump publicly asked Russia for help https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/donald-trump-calls-...

Firstly, Rachel Maddow has a very poor and biased record on the whole Russia story. Part of the propaganda, I would say. So no need for that opinion piece, we can link direct to the actual video of the event.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kxG8uJUsWU

This is not evidence that Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election. It's clearly a joke that is typical of his jokes during his campaign rallies. Does it not ring any alarm bells with you that this is the keystone "evidence" that gets wheeled out by people who claim they have proof Trump colluded with Putin?

What we actually know is that there was never any evidence that Trump colluded with Putin, the alleged evidence that was the foundation of the wire tapping and investigation was fabricated https://nypost.com/2021/11/09/ex-state-dept-spox-slams-schif... and prominent politicians on intelligence committees lied to the public about what evidence they had https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts....

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#32

I'm fascinated by North Korea. I think the author shouldn't be so smug about seeing through their propaganda. We have such a sophisticated propaganda in the west that it's much harder to see it. In comparison NK propaganda is refreshingly childish, funny I would say.

Quoted post unavailable.

Yes, unfortunately. You also have many people who believe Trump said Nazis are very fine people. You have many people who believe Trump told his supporters to drink bleach in other to fight coronavirus.

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#33

I'm fascinated by North Korea. I think the author shouldn't be so smug about seeing through their propaganda. We have such a sophisticated propaganda in the west that it's much harder to see it. In comparison NK propaganda is refreshingly childish, funny I would say.

Quoted post unavailable.

that's a very poor comparison to the outright falsehoods perpetuated by propaganda. Not only was the Trump campaign never exonerated of the collusion accusations, but several associates were convicted for their dealings with Russia related to the election and investigation:

-----

"If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime... A president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view – that too is prohibited."[164]

Dozens of ongoing investigations originally handled by the Special Counsel's office were forwarded to district and state prosecutors, other Department of Justice (DoJ) branches, and other federal agencies.[165] The following (in alphabetical order) were indicted during the Mueller investigation:

13 Russians implicated in election interference: Mueller's team indicted thirteen Russian citizens, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), Concord Management and Consulting and Concord Catering with conducting social media campaigns about the U.S. elections.[166] Twelve of the Russian defendants, who were alleged to be members of the Russian GRU cyber espionage group known as Fancy Bear, were charged in June 2018 with hacking and leaking DNC emails.[167] The other Russian indicted, who was not a direct employee of Fancy Bear, was Russian business tycoon Yevgeny Prigozhin, who was alleged to have served as the financier for the organization.[168] The US government dropped all charges against Concord Management and Consulting and Concord Catering in March 2020.[154] In November 2019, Time magazine reported that it was "unlikely that any of the Russians will ever face a trial in the United States, but the charges make it harder for them to travel overseas".[169] Maria Butina, who had claimed to be a Russian gun activist, was investigated by the Special Counsel investigators and then prosecuted by the National Security Law Unit. She was imprisoned for espionage after entering a guilty plea.[170][171] Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer, pled guilty to making hush payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal in violation of campaign finance laws, and was convicted for several unrelated counts of bank and tax fraud.[172][173] Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, who had been appointed as National Security Advisor by the incoming Trump administration, was dismissed from his position and later pled guilty to making false statements to FBI investigators about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition.[174][175] Konstantin Kilimnik, Manafort's business partner in Ukraine, was indicted for witness tampering at the behest of Manafort;[176] Kilimnik is suspected of working for Russian intelligence.[177] Paul Manafort, former Trump campaign chairman was found guilty on eight felony counts of tax evasion and bank fraud,[178] pursuant to his earlier lobbying activities for the Party of Regions of former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich.[179][180] He later pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud and obstruction of justice;[181][182] in total, he was sentenced to over seven years in jail[183] in February 2018. George Papadopoulos, Trump campaign adviser, was convicted for making false statements to the FBI.[184] Roger Stone, a longtime Trump advisor who had met with a Russian person offering to sell derogatory financial information about Hillary Clinton,[185] was indicted on seven charges of lying to Congress and witness tampering. He pled not guilty.[186] The jury subsequently found him guilty on all seven counts.[187]

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#34
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

that's a very poor comparison to the outright falsehoods perpetuated by propaganda. Not only was the Trump campaign never exonerated of the collusion accusations, but several associates were convicted for their dealings with Russia related to the election and investigation: ----- "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination…

> that's a very poor comparison to the outright falsehoods perpetuated by propaganda.

No it's a very apt one. Millions of people fervently "know" that ample evidence exists implicating Trump in colluding with Putin to hack the election. They've never seen it, but they are sure it must be there. Just the same as this wall.

> Not only was the Trump campaign never exonerated of the collusion accusations,

It was, by the Mueller report.

From https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

Excerpts from p.181-183

"The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law—including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed further below."

"The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials—or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals—to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume I, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume I, Section II, supra."

"The investigation did not, however, yield evidence sufficient to sustain any charge that any individual affiliated with the Trump Campaign acted as an agent of a foreign principal within the meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government of Russia, or any official thereof. In particular, the Office did not find evidence likely to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government—or at its direction, control, or request during the relevant time period."

> but several associates were convicted for their dealings with Russia related to the election and investigation:

No Trump associates or campaign personnel were convicted for their dealings with Russia relating to the election.

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#35
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny, many Europeans say the same about America. Not defending NK but the situation has persisted because nobody wants to deal with the flood of refugees a collapsed regime would create. I wouldn’t count on the situation resolving itself in our lifetimes.

Americans have trouble paying for healthcare. That is true and terrible. It is also not equivalent to having ten percent of your population starve to death in a famine or being executed for religious proselytizing.

This exactly. I like comparing the absolute bottom denominator. I would never want to find myself in a US prison. They appear to be some of the worst in the 'developed' world.

I would easily choose a US prison over a North Korean prison, and one could even make a decent case of time in a US prison vs time as an average peasant in North Korea.

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In comparison NK propaganda is refreshingly childish, funny I would say. I think you're yourself falling for North Korea propaganda, the reality there is nothing childish: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-china-sex-slav...

The Korea Future Initiative is unsurprisingly funded by NED, making this article propaganda indeed.

This is a fairly deceptive statement. The Korea Future Initiative received a grand total of $50,000 (about 16% of its total fundraising) in 2020 from the NED.

https://www.ned.org/region/asia/north-korea-2020/

https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/chari...

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Yes, unfortunately. You also have many people who believe Trump said Nazis are very fine people. You have many people who believe Trump told his supporters to drink bleach in other to fight coronavirus.

And unfortunately, we have many people who still believe Trump won the 2020 election.

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#38
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's another example? That the sun rises in the east? Oh, the fools who fall for propaganda!

Unlike this Korean wall or any evidence that Trump colluded with Putin, you've seen the sun rising in the east.

We must live on different planets. There are literally mountains of evidence publicly available, and many thoroughly researched books by respected lawyers and political scientists on the subject. You can't live in denial of the obvious and at the same time have the chutzpah to accuse others of lacking evidence. Who's the propaganda victim here?

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#39
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

that's a very poor comparison to the outright falsehoods perpetuated by propaganda. Not only was the Trump campaign never exonerated of the collusion accusations, but several associates were convicted for their dealings with Russia related to the election and investigation: ----- "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination…

> that's a very poor comparison to the outright falsehoods perpetuated by propaganda. No it's a very apt one. Millions of people fervently "know" that ample evidence exists implicating Trump in colluding with Putin to hack the election. They've never seen it, but they are sure it must be there. Just the same as this wall. > Not only was the Trump campaign never exonerated of the collusion accusations, It was, by the…

If it was "propaganda" as opposed to credible, unproven allegations you'd be pointing us to paragraphs about how meetings between Trump campaign officers and Russian officials probably or definitely did not happen as alleged, not clutching at the straws of "did not find evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt [specific offence]" in an investigation which substantiated that there was contact between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives and resulted in criminal prosecutions of some of the participants for lying about that contact anyway.

When the OP suggest that claims of a South Korean built wall stretching the full length of the border are baseless propaganda, he's not doing so from the starting point that yes, there's obviously a wall going the full length of the border but we can't be confident of convicting its builders of criminal intent

Re: North Korea's Loch Ness Monster (2016)

#40
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unlike this Korean wall or any evidence that Trump colluded with Putin, you've seen the sun rising in the east.

We must live on different planets. There are literally mountains of evidence publicly available, and many thoroughly researched books by respected lawyers and political scientists on the subject. You can't live in denial of the obvious and at the same time have the chutzpah to accuse others of lacking evidence. Who's the propaganda victim here?

> We must live on different planets.

This was my point.

> There are literally mountains of evidence publicly available, and many thoroughly researched books by respected lawyers and political scientists on the subject.

The Mueller report didn't find any such mountains. Some of the biggest peddlers of the conspiracy theory have been recently been forced into embarrassing back downs https://nypost.com/2021/11/09/ex-state-dept-spox-slams-schif...

> You can't live in denial of the obvious and at the same time have the chutzpah to accuse others of lacking evidence.

What I can say for certain is that looking past all the bluster and propaganda and claims of what exists, I have never seen evidence proving Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election.

> Who's the propaganda victim here?

The people who believe there is evidence Trump/campaign colluded with Russia are.

Post reply on HN