Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say don't do it. I'm in a similar position (profitable company with an interesting back-story) and it seems like a bad idea to start giving out your personal financial details to the world.
But there's probably an interesting middle ground.
Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
31–40 of 69 posts
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#32I realize that there are exceptions and there are ideas that need funding to get going, but the whole incestious culture of venture capitalists, investors, and startup idea owners often doesn't foster real innovation. It instead lines the pockets of a select few with millions of dollars. Just a slick redistribution of wealth.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#3337signals? :-)
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#34Bootstrapped startup owner here... I am of the opinion that if a business on the Web needs millions of dollars to get off the ground, then it's probably a business that isn't worth getting off the ground. I realize that there are exceptions and there are ideas that need funding to get going, but the whole incestious culture of venture capitalists, investors, and startup idea owners often doesn't foster real innovatio…
There are some businesses that you could simply not start without significant upfront investment. True, there are lots of businesses you could start with just very cheaply ($100's or $1000's) and grow organically over time. The easiest of these would be paid online apps/services where you could scale your expenses (servers, bandwidth, etc) with revenue. But some businesses need money upfront to get started. The most obvious example would be anything involving hardware. You could bootstrap while building a prototype, but you would likely need outside investment to manufacture and distribute your product. Even a web only business might need lots of investment to break into a market through advertising or partnerships.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#35Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
But there's probably an interesting middle ground.
What would that be, though? Either you're talking about your company and making some information public, or you aren't. If you're going to go down that route, granted you may not want to reveal everything , but you should probably do enough to get some attention, if that's the point. Otherwise you're just revealing information for no benefit.
(I haven't seen Balsamiq post detailed revenue and their breakup lately.)
I would say do what feels comfortable to you. Most likely, it is to keep revenues etc. secret. Revealing those details might get some eyeballs in the short term but not customers.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#37half of them I never even heard of...just goes to show the lack of coverage for self funded companies
Those of us who are running profitable bootstrapped companies tend to put less effort into getting our name in the tech or business press. It is more important that we get our name into the minds of our customers, as our cash flow does not come from Sand Hill Road. So, this lack of coverage should come as no surprise.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#38Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#39Reminds me of one of the lessons from Soul of a New Machine: forced scarcity can breed creativity. Too much money allows you to defer hard decisions for too long.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#40half of them I never even heard of...just goes to show the lack of coverage for self funded companies
Those of us who are running profitable bootstrapped companies tend to put less effort into getting our name in the tech or business press. It is more important that we get our name into the minds of our customers, as our cash flow does not come from Sand Hill Road. So, this lack of coverage should come as no surprise.