This book is distributed under a non commercial license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) [0]. While I understand that language is evolving and that only under a "strict definition" of open access does it mean removing barriers to copying and reuse [1], it's seems pretty duplicitous to say it's "open" while putting it under a non-commercial license. [0] https://github.com/rougier/scientific-visualization-book/blo... [1] https://en.w…
The NC part was mostly to avoid having someone to sell the book on some platform without my knowledge.
I'm pointing out that you've stated it's "open access" without making it open access, at least for a strict interpretation of open access.