Live data from Hacker News

Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

innovationaus.com

31–40 of 294 posts

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#31
post #2

No, we are not complacent. If we leave our home detention to protest anything we are arrested. Where the fuck can I claim asylum?

With the US keeping the land border closed, it will soon be impossible to leave Canada without being vaccinated (or bribing a border guard).

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#33

It’s a fairly complex situation. Most people just don’t realise all the encroaching police state laws even exist (I refer to the real ones Federally, not the temporary State-Government health orders that some people have tried to blow out of proportion). We have very little media diversity. The few billionaires who own the few outlets enjoy the continuing tax cuts, random free grants, advertising spend, etc. from the…

We can't blame the LNP for all of this. All of the surveillance related bills passed in the last 10 years have been bipartisan.

I'd also go as far as to say this is what Australians want. Many people believe these laws won't be used against regular citizens and will assist in law enforcement efforts.

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#34
post #3

It's been an odd experience having a few Australian HN posters attempt to rationalize to me why their police are justified in shooting people who leave their homes with rubber bullets, and why it's normal to be required to take surveillance photos of themselves in their own residences. I guess strict authoritarianism must be accompanied with equally strict media propaganda.

Is it common for people in Australia to leave home with rubber bullets?

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#35
The problem is that it is very easy to have a decent life here in Australia. We have never had to feel the full force of the repercussions of our voting or policies and as such there is an apathy towards the direction of government policies, at least within my age group - "I don't care they can have my meme's" or some variation of "I have nothing to hide" is the most common attitude.

Unfortunately, by the time the effects are felt by the vast majority of the population it will be too late - indeed with the recent Identify and Disrupt legislation, it would be completely legal for the government to take over the accounts of the leaders for any meaningful protests or awareness groups and use that trust to break the groups from the inside, or at the least crush momentum as it appears.

If anyone has any useful advice or tips to raise awareness please let me know.

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#36
post #24

Covid, like 9/11 is a Trojan horse being used to turn seemingly sane people into fanatics who will support any measure to defeat the enemy. Watching people I used to respect become hateful shells of their former selves has been extremely unpleasant.

If you thought "Terror" was an amorphous, undefeatable enemy on which to wage war, wait until you get a load of the War on the Virus.

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#37
post #3

It's been an odd experience having a few Australian HN posters attempt to rationalize to me why their police are justified in shooting people who leave their homes with rubber bullets, and why it's normal to be required to take surveillance photos of themselves in their own residences. I guess strict authoritarianism must be accompanied with equally strict media propaganda.

> police are justified in shooting people who leave their homes with rubber bullets

This is not true at all. As an Australian who has been following protests closely and the police response, they are clearly only shooting rubber bullets at those who are:

- Throwing glass bottles at police

- Attacking "fake news" journalists

- Damaging buildings and monuments.

Black Lives Matter protests peacefully marched through the city last year and no rubber bullets were used.

> why it's normal to be required to take surveillance photos of themselves in their own residences

Unless you're in quarantine, this is not a requirement. Are you suggesting that we should not have a quarantine program? Or continue to use hotels, which are ill-equip for quarantining, and lead to the initial outbreaks here in Australia?

> I guess strict authoritarianism must be accompanied with equally strict media propaganda.

Media diversity has never been worse. I agree that things need to change. That however, has nothing to do with CHO directives.

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#38
post #29
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reason we have such low deaths is because of the measures in place. They are slowly changing as vaccination targets are met and life should be back to normalish by December.

Australia spent 300 billion in one year on the covid response, and what do we have to show for it?

Preservation of the status quo?

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#39

I live in NZ and feel that commentors of our govts approach overstate the level of authoritarianism we're experiencing. Its not universal but it feels more like the majority of people recognize that lockdowns and other restrictions are for the greater good. If you are arrested you are not going to be "disapeared", you will be processed like anyone else breaking a law. While we might collectively trust the current ele…

At least in Australia and for myself personally, I am not worried about how we are being treated _now_, I am worried about the powers that have the capacity to be abused in the future without a legal standing for opposition.

Re: Australians ‘complacent’ to rapid growth in digital surveillance

#40
post #3

It's been an odd experience having a few Australian HN posters attempt to rationalize to me why their police are justified in shooting people who leave their homes with rubber bullets, and why it's normal to be required to take surveillance photos of themselves in their own residences. I guess strict authoritarianism must be accompanied with equally strict media propaganda.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN