Live data from Hacker News

How does Google pay 2.4%?

cameronkeng.com

31–40 of 80 posts

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#31

Why on Earth do we bother with a corporate income tax at all? Just get rid of it and bump up capital gains to compensate.

Great question. My understanding was that the (primary) purpose of corprate income tax is not to directly collect revenue, but rather to encourage reinvestment by firms in the economy. Increasing CGT would discourage investment. Can others please enlighten us?

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#32
post #16

Fixing this sort of loophole should be far higher on Congress's list of priorities than it is now. There is no reason why a massively profitable corporation like Google should pay so little in taxes when poor Americans are nickel-and-dimed with sales, payroll and income taxes.

The problem goes far beyond Google Ireland and Google Netherlands. What about Tata, Reliance, Baidu and Guinness? None of them pay their fair share to the US government.

Something must be done about these evil corporations which exist outside the US, don't bring money into the US, do no business in the US, and pay no taxes in the US!

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#34
post #17

Actually, no company _really_ pays taxes. Taxes are another cost of doing business which is passed on to the consumer

Not generally true; companies already attempt to charge the highest rates that the market can bear, so if they could easily just raise prices, they would've already raised them before the tax to gain more profits.

In the general case, an increase in costs will come out of some combination of: 1) increased prices passed onto consumers; 2) decreased wages at the firm; and 3) decreased profits at the firm. There's no economic law that says they'll all come out of #1, unless it's such a perfectly-competitive commodity business that everyone is charging barely above cost for their services to begin with (not the usual case in Silicon Valley).

Consider the flip side: If all cost reduction were automatically passed on directly into price cuts, there would be no incentive for companies to trim costs. But that isn't the case, of course; one reason firms aim to reduce their costs is that reducing costs while keeping prices fixed is one way to increase profits. Similarly, increased costs without the ability to raise prices can reduce profits. In both cases it depends on the surrounding market.

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#35
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

its not like it was years ago when CitiCorp set up theri stock trading units in the Islands for a similar purpose..

Citi went farther. They did things like declare a particular desk in a skyscraper in NY to be legally in the Cayman Islands. The IRS was not amused.

Do you have a source on this? I'd love to read more about this.

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#36
post #25

Anyone interested in this will also be interested in learning about IKEA: http://www.economist.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=691913... And, more recently, some details about how they do it: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2437643c-2985-11e0-bb9b-00144...

I've actually been asked about IKEA in the past as well. The crux of the issue is that IKEA is the largest single employer and GDP powerhouse of Sweden. So, the country has been more than understanding of their "tax plan."

The founder of ikea essentially owns everything through a charity and avoid all taxes for effective purposes.

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#37

Why on Earth do we bother with a corporate income tax at all? Just get rid of it and bump up capital gains to compensate.

Great question. My understanding was that the (primary) purpose of corprate income tax is not to directly collect revenue, but rather to encourage reinvestment by firms in the economy. Increasing CGT would discourage investment. Can others please enlighten us?

Well the corporate tax is meant to collect revenue but it's secondary goal is promote certain activities. Mainly, they want to promote job creation and increased productivity, which is in theory done through reinvestment.

When you reinvest into equipment, the logic goes that the productivity increases and new higher paid jobs are created even though the lower end labor is eliminated or reduced.

Increasing capital gains tax would in effect make everyone accelerate the sale of their company before the taxes are effective, so it was a mass liquidation of capital.

But, I don't believe it would discourage investment because people would simply tax plan around the capital gains tax. A while back, during Reagan and friends presidency, the personal income tax as well as capital gains tax was more than 35%. People actually invested more into corporations because the corporate tax rates were lower (ironically).

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#38
Why hasn't someone created a company that handles this setup for small to midsize companies? Think of it as the Paychex for legal tax evasion. Their clients could all share the same legal addresses in Ireland and the Netherlands. They could keep up with the shifting tax laws and take care of opening all the appropriate banks accounts and filling out the right forms.

Of course, the loopholes should be closed, but until they are we could at least keep things fair by making the same techniques available to anyone.

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#39
post #21

Back when Commodore was a company I had the opportunity to get a look at its tax structure (I was interviewing for a VP position with the parent company). It was pretty impressive how effectively one could exploit nominal loop-holes in various jurisdiction tax codes to achieve near zero taxation. One of the more dubious strategies was having a company in the Cayman Islands that owned the cars that people drove and pa…

Lol. It sounds like I worked with your friend. I'd like to note that the US is also a noted tax haven for foreign countries. We aggressively allow our country act as a tax shield for European and Asian companies so we should be throw rocks either when we live in a glass house

I'm not sure that makes sense. Let's say, hypothetically, the Europe and Asia have a tax rate of 99%. We offer a tax rate to foreign companies of 2%, to make it obviously worthwhile to funnel their money through the US. At the same time, we tax US companies at 98%. This makes sense because it maximizes revenue -- US companies aren't going to go abroad, and everyone else in the world will want to give us 2% of their money. Epic win.

I doubt the real world works like this, though.

Re: How does Google pay 2.4%?

#40

Why hasn't someone created a company that handles this setup for small to midsize companies? Think of it as the Paychex for legal tax evasion. Their clients could all share the same legal addresses in Ireland and the Netherlands. They could keep up with the shifting tax laws and take care of opening all the appropriate banks accounts and filling out the right forms. Of course, the loopholes should be closed, but unti…

Well technically it is available for small to midsize companies. There a number of websites that market these plans, but usually they're pretty sketchy haha. As an example, "www.escapeartist.com" are what's usually available openly.

Most tax professionals that are capable will provide these tax plans to their clients, but they'll do so quietly because its not something you'd want to advertise and also people generally dont like it when they find out you've gone "offshore" and etc.

Post reply on HN