Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe on twitter. Otherwise I don't think anyone would care.
CNNs drop in ratings would beg to differ.
YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
31–40 of 66 posts
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#32- No statistics for previous administration's like/dislike removal rate. Was it lower? Higher? We don't know.
- No statistics for YouTube like/dislike removal rates on other kinds of political or non-political videos. Maybe this is extraordinary behavior for YouTube, or maybe not. We don't know.
In other words, this is flame bait that people can read into whatever they want to confirm their biases. With a heavy dose of partisan editorializing ("Disgusting!").
At best, it shows a need for more principled study from someone else.
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#33A incident like this also happened in the past and there youtube said that they remove malicious or spammy votes, though did not seem to comment on the concrete case. https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/25/did-youtube-r...
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#34Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#35Dislikes removed, or bots banned (taking the votes with them)?
I see likes and dislikes change over time even on videos with very few likes and views.
I just assume it is some sort of cleanup system.
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#36I'm a little shocked that this is getting so much traction here. The site (81m-dot-org) seems to be a right-wing "the election was stolen from Trump" site. Their "about" page says: It is true that Biden won the most votes cast for a U.S. presidential candidate, amassing about 81 million votes. Such a popular president should have some truly epic YouTube numbers. Let's keep track. I'm sure we won't see anything weird…
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#37Can you imagine how much of "scandal" this would have been if this happened during the last administration?
This is a scandal regardless of administration. That's why it's on the front page on Hacker News and being written about by major media publications.
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#38The tone in this is... Less than stellar. This is standard operating procedure, mainly dealing with deleted accounts, and reducing spam or bot actions on the site. 3.9M removed over the course of 500+ videos for a global account for one of the largest countries isn't all that surprising. They also remove likes and comments for spam reasons as well, which this "article" (if you can call it that) just so happened to ig…
> The tone in this is... Less than stellar. Agreed. I got down to the "So odd for the most popular resident ever!" and realized I got duped into reading some ideologue's rant against the other team and now I have to question the data provided and wonder what context got casually discarded.
Re: YouTube removed 3.9M dislikes for White House
#39This is presented in a way that infers political partisanship, but without any evidence for or against that argument. - No statistics for previous administration's like/dislike removal rate. Was it lower? Higher? We don't know. - No statistics for YouTube like/dislike removal rates on other kinds of political or non-political videos. Maybe this is extraordinary behavior for YouTube, or maybe not. We don't know. In ot…