World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
31–40 of 198 posts
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#32The world bank responding to such a request shows how big of a thing Bitcoin has become. It also appears that the concerns are not strong, more wishy-washy comments that could be disputed or clarified eventually. Wonder what they say if/when more countries do inquiries and adopt Bitcoin.
The World Bank would respond to such a request from a Government, it doesn't mean it's a 'big deal'. Their statement is clear. They very politely and in so many words saying: 1) To start you are corrupt and none of this will work without solving that 2) it makes no financial sense and 3) there are real environmental concerns. When they sat 'transparency' what they mean is 'you are corrupt'. When they cite 'regulatory…
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#33Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#34Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#35They cite environmental and transparency concerns, but somehow I believe it's more about control and ensuring the continuation of the debt based fiat systems. I have a litmus test I use when discussing global financial politics with friends - "What were the main factors you think lead to Ghaddafi's killing?"
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#36Other random bitcoin concerns (apart from the environmental ones): - How about people stop accepting laundered bitcoins first and foremost? - Any bitcoins that have provably been involved in illegal stuff - Any monero/whathaveyou that come from exchanges that accept bitcoin that have received Bitcoins that were involved in illegal stuff - Will bitcoin still have value when quantum computers are around?
Regarding quantum computers: Quantum computers are not known to be exponentially faster at hashing than normal computers, so they pose no threat to bitcoin.
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the case of El Salvador, Bitcoin mining will be used to bootstrap geothermal. Bitcoin can finance the energy generation and later transmission infrastructure can be added.
Ok, but geothermal energy creates pollution. It's considered a cleaner alternative to tradition energy sources insofar as it replaces existing energy demands, not when the demand is being created ad hoc.
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#38Will the big banks, institutions and governments make a move against DeFi soon? Seems like it.
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#39>"While the government did approach us for assistance on Bitcoin, this is not something the World Bank can support given the environmental and transparency shortcomings," they added. Environmental as the #1 concern? Bitcoin's enegery:market-cap ratio - a proxy for energy vs. value to humans - is >300x better than an airline & 60x better than JP Morgan & 20x better than google's. https://twitter.com/Okcoin/status/1403…
Market cap is not, to me, any kind proxy for "value to humans". The utility of Bitcoin as an alternative to fiat is obviously unrelated to the number coins or their price.
Re: World Bank rejects El Salvador request for Bitcoin help
#40The US uses the dollar as a weapon and it controls the world bank. So it makes sense that they won't help to de-dollarize the world.
Chas. T. Main's former vice president Einar Greve, who first offered Perkins a job at the firm,[1]:10 initially affirmed the overall validity of the book:[12]
> Basically his story is true.… What John's book says is, there was a conspiracy to put all these countries on the hook, and that happened. Whether or not it was some sinister plot or not is up to interpretation, but many of these countries are still over the barrel and have never been able to repay the loans.