Earlier quoted context omitted.
My read is it's just the NHTSA not granting a certification for things it hasn't tested. Ie, "forward collision warning, lane departure warning, crash imminent braking and dynamic brake support" without radar. Tesla will release the new versions (if they haven't already), the NHTSA will test the new models, and they'll grant the "check marks" again. In other words, it's non-news (unless you happen to be planning to b…
> Tesla will release the new versions (if they haven't already), the NHTSA will test the new models, and they'll grant the "check marks" again. Shouldn't this operate in the other direction? Vehicle manufacturer supplies model for testing, regulator either approves it gives manufacturer opportunity to fix then retest?
Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
31–40 of 379 posts
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's all sorts of rumors for why Elon / Tesla is doing this. The most probable rumor IMO is that the chip-shortage has hit the Tesla radar especially hard. Instead of idling plants (like other automakers https://www.autonews.com/manufacturing/ford-idles-f-150-plan... ), Tesla decided to cut out the radar entirely. That means cars can be produced, and sold, without these radars / chips.
Tesla has been pushing camera-only autonomous driving (ditching LIDAR) since well before the chip shortage. I would assume this is part of the same drive.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/24/22451404/tesla-luminar-li...
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Tesla will release the new versions (if they haven't already), the NHTSA will test the new models, and they'll grant the "check marks" again. Shouldn't this operate in the other direction? Vehicle manufacturer supplies model for testing, regulator either approves it gives manufacturer opportunity to fix then retest?
Pretty sure it's not a requirement for vehicles to have these safety features to go to market. So from Tesla's perspective this is better that delaying their product that they think is equivalent (though in my mind they're taking a risk.)
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#34So if we were going to purchase one soon, should we instead wait for this to be fixed?
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#35Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Tesla will release the new versions (if they haven't already), the NHTSA will test the new models, and they'll grant the "check marks" again. Shouldn't this operate in the other direction? Vehicle manufacturer supplies model for testing, regulator either approves it gives manufacturer opportunity to fix then retest?
Pretty sure it's not a requirement for vehicles to have these safety features to go to market. So from Tesla's perspective this is better that delaying their product that they think is equivalent (though in my mind they're taking a risk.)
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#37I'm having trouble figuring out if this is just another battle in Elon's War with Regulators, if this is NHTSA being too slow to keep up with evolving technology, or if Teslas without radar are actually worse, deserving the loss of these designations. Or what the mix is of all three of those things, I guess.
NHTSA tested Tesla cars that had radar modules. Tesla has decided to remove the radar modules and use only vision systems. The new vision-only models are not NHTSA certified yet, so the NHTSA had to clarify that the safety certification only applies to vehicles shipped before the vision-only transition. That is, any vehicle with radar is still certified, but the new vehicles will apparently ship untested.
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's all sorts of rumors for why Elon / Tesla is doing this. The most probable rumor IMO is that the chip-shortage has hit the Tesla radar especially hard. Instead of idling plants (like other automakers https://www.autonews.com/manufacturing/ford-idles-f-150-plan... ), Tesla decided to cut out the radar entirely. That means cars can be produced, and sold, without these radars / chips.
Tesla has been pushing camera-only autonomous driving (ditching LIDAR) since well before the chip shortage. I would assume this is part of the same drive.
I'm pulling this from archive.org, because Tesla has removed this blogpost from their servers.
As recently as March, they kept this pro-Radar blogpost up. Only now are they purging this data from their archives. Fortunately, the Internet Archive remembers the history, so they won't find it so easy to rewrite history in their favor.
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
NHTSA tested Tesla cars that had radar modules. Tesla has decided to remove the radar modules and use only vision systems. The new vision-only models are not NHTSA certified yet, so the NHTSA had to clarify that the safety certification only applies to vehicles shipped before the vision-only transition. That is, any vehicle with radar is still certified, but the new vehicles will apparently ship untested.
It sounds from reading the article like existing cars with the radar are also losing the features though, to be replaced by camera-based solutions? (I assume to keep consistent with newer models on the road without the radar). I may be reading it wrong - happy to be corrected.
Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features
#40Tesla owners, we should sue Tesla for this. They're going to take away features that influenced our purchasing decision with an OTA update. This should not be allowed.