Live data from Hacker News

Robinhood Files S-1

blog.robinhood.com

31–40 of 56 posts

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think there is another broker with zero commission options trading is there? That seems like a big reason for a lot of people

Not sure about others but Ameritrade is charging $.65 per option trade and that's almost nothing - https://www.tdameritrade.com/pricing.page

That's not per trade, that's per contract.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#32
post #7

I am interested to know what percentage of their user base they lost after the past few months. I know I personally cancelled my account with Robinhood, but I don't know if I'm in the minority or not. I just don't see the point of them anymore. Once the other trading platforms started offering $0 transactions, I saw way less value in Robinhood - then, following that, the argument was "fractional shares", which many o…

I would think it's not insignificant amount of money considering that propagation of cost basis is taking over two months and counting. All brokers are saying Robinhood id slammed by people that left and is unable to make it within the standard 14 days.

I can't speak for the size or amount of users, but definitely it had an impact.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I moved away but not because of the GME/liquidity issues but rather their handling of 1099 tax information the last two years has been terrible (delayed, altering website to cover up their delays, and corrected both years). It is just unprofessional. Plus they only offer "First In, First Out" stock sales which can have absolutely MASSIVE tax implications. Most real brokers offer FIFO, LIFO, and most importantly speci…

I don't get this fascination with their UI. The charts are terrible (other than looking cool) and the current holdings list sucks. It is as if it is written for people allergic to information density.

I think a lot of what people are talking about when they say "Robinhood UI" is buying/selling, instant deposits, etc. Purchasing fractional shares on Schwab requires depositing money, waiting for it to clear, and clicking through several different pages. Robinhood making every account a margin account to allow purchases before deposits a gamechanger. That said, I agree that the charts are useless and viewing all of your holdings is a chore.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I moved away but not because of the GME/liquidity issues but rather their handling of 1099 tax information the last two years has been terrible (delayed, altering website to cover up their delays, and corrected both years). It is just unprofessional. Plus they only offer "First In, First Out" stock sales which can have absolutely MASSIVE tax implications. Most real brokers offer FIFO, LIFO, and most importantly speci…

I don't get this fascination with their UI. The charts are terrible (other than looking cool) and the current holdings list sucks. It is as if it is written for people allergic to information density.

I don't understand what you mean about their charts, my regular broker has no real time charts at all, and the charts they do provide leave a lot to be desired. RH chart's also allows you to jump between day/week/3 month/etc and get a summary of performance within those ranges (which would normally be tabular data). Plus you can mouse hover over the history to get spot pricing on that date.

High information density has a place, but when it directly results on me needing two different screens to get the information I need on one screen then it is a real problem. For example my regular broker's order flow requires me to have two tabs, one to order, and one to show my existing position's cost basis. That's broken.

I think the situation speaks more to just how terrible existing broker's UI/UX is, rather than RH inventing something novel. They just make an interface that was basically solid, which is oddly rare for brokers.

Google's homepage has better stock charts than my regular broker for example (and RH's charts are better than Google's).

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#35
FWIW, Robinhood has zero fees on crypto! I believe they are the least expensive option on bitcoin, ether, etc.

You don't actually take possession of the coin - no wallet, etc, purely custodial. But saves the 3.5% bitcoin fee from Coinbase!

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#36
post #7

I am interested to know what percentage of their user base they lost after the past few months. I know I personally cancelled my account with Robinhood, but I don't know if I'm in the minority or not. I just don't see the point of them anymore. Once the other trading platforms started offering $0 transactions, I saw way less value in Robinhood - then, following that, the argument was "fractional shares", which many o…

I would guess they gained more users than they lost. The outrage was real and obviously some users left, but at the end of the day most people will still use whatever platform is easiest and cheapest for them.

Wait why are you assuming they gained more than lost? OP also mentioned that other places have $0 trades anyway in terms of the cheapness.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I moved away but not because of the GME/liquidity issues but rather their handling of 1099 tax information the last two years has been terrible (delayed, altering website to cover up their delays, and corrected both years). It is just unprofessional. Plus they only offer "First In, First Out" stock sales which can have absolutely MASSIVE tax implications. Most real brokers offer FIFO, LIFO, and most importantly speci…

I don't get this fascination with their UI. The charts are terrible (other than looking cool) and the current holdings list sucks. It is as if it is written for people allergic to information density.

It's simple, fast, and at least back when I used it, was reasonably consistent.

I'm all for information density, but using Schwab, Vanguard, whatever results in slow to load pages which refresh every time I click a button. Half the pages look completely different than the other half of the pages, I use ctrl-f to find any buttons to click, and sometimes pages just don't load because they don't feel like it.

Banking websites are horribly broken and outdated on a technical level, even if I don't consider the design aesthetic.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#38
post #7

I am interested to know what percentage of their user base they lost after the past few months. I know I personally cancelled my account with Robinhood, but I don't know if I'm in the minority or not. I just don't see the point of them anymore. Once the other trading platforms started offering $0 transactions, I saw way less value in Robinhood - then, following that, the argument was "fractional shares", which many o…

I would guess they gained more users than they lost. The outrage was real and obviously some users left, but at the end of the day most people will still use whatever platform is easiest and cheapest for them.

Agreed. I bet the GME stuff that happened resulted in _a lot_ of free advertising for Robinhood.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would guess they gained more users than they lost. The outrage was real and obviously some users left, but at the end of the day most people will still use whatever platform is easiest and cheapest for them.

Wait why are you assuming they gained more than lost? OP also mentioned that other places have $0 trades anyway in terms of the cheapness.

But they aren't anywhere near as seamless or slick as Robinhood. I exclusively use Charles Schwab but I don't even really think they're competing for the same type of users that much.

Re: Robinhood Files S-1

#40
post #8
post #7

I am interested to know what percentage of their user base they lost after the past few months. I know I personally cancelled my account with Robinhood, but I don't know if I'm in the minority or not. I just don't see the point of them anymore. Once the other trading platforms started offering $0 transactions, I saw way less value in Robinhood - then, following that, the argument was "fractional shares", which many o…

Probably a small but not insignificant loss. I don't think the WSB / Memestock users are the majority of the platform. For a lot of people I know RH still has the best feeling UX and easiest access for simple investing. I think they're fine but if pessimism means the stock takes a haircut or dive when it starts trading I'm going to buy-in. There really is not a similar investing app that appeals to the Gen-Z / Millen…

Absolutely this. Too many people overfocus on the $0 trading fees because that is how Robinhood initially differentiated itself, but it is absolutely the experience that is keeping people today.

$0 fees have been commonplace for a few years now.

Post reply on HN