Live data from Hacker News

Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

salon.com

31–40 of 47 posts

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#31
post #15
post #3

lol - "repeat misinformers" Ministry of Truth indeed. Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as a flipping implementation guide.

Please don't post unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments to HN, even when something feels Orwellian. It doesn't help.

Okay may be lol is not really HN style. But how is the above comment flame bait. It just calls the article calling for Orwellian measures which it does by any reasonable standard (thought police?).

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#32
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This view, though probably correct, is incompatible with democracy. We can't have rule by the people if the people aren't capable of ruling themselves. I still believe democracy is the best way forward, but it depends on critical thinking and there seems to be a decline in that area recently.

> it depends on critical thinking and there seems to be a decline in that area recently. Respectfully, I call bullshit. There has always been a lack of critical thinking, we just didn't have the internet to bear witness. I think people are complaining about a lack of critical thinking more now because there are more educated people around to think critically. So I agree that we need critical thinking, but let's not b…

Yeah I don't think critical thinking is worse than before, it's just being amplified by the feedback loop that social media has become.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it depends on critical thinking and there seems to be a decline in that area recently. Respectfully, I call bullshit. There has always been a lack of critical thinking, we just didn't have the internet to bear witness. I think people are complaining about a lack of critical thinking more now because there are more educated people around to think critically. So I agree that we need critical thinking, but let's not b…

Yeah I don't think critical thinking is worse than before, it's just being amplified by the feedback loop that social media has become.

Some time ago, here on HN, user api described social media as a "hate laser". I thought that was a brilliant term - stimulated emissions of hate. But maybe social media is a "stupid laser" as well.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#35

Name one time in history when the group burning books and censoring people were the good guys.

Name one other time in history when memes could be spread and amplified at the same rate and level as through social media.

Europe survived the invention of the printing press just fine.

The parallels between the internet and the printing press are many.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is how they steal free speech from you. Make you believe that adults aren’t capable of managing their lives or beliefs.

How do you explain QAnon, then?

QAnon may prove that (at least some) adults aren't capable of managing their lives or beliefs. Even if that is true, though, free speech is still worth preserving, because the alternative is worse.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Name one other time in history when memes could be spread and amplified at the same rate and level as through social media.

Europe survived the invention of the printing press just fine. The parallels between the internet and the printing press are many.

The owner of a particular press made their own determination about what was worthy of printing.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#38
Of course they don't. Just like they don't keep showing me things from "WOW app" and "OMG app" and "WTF app" or "BBQ app" (you get the point) that I have blocked/hidden/filtered repeatedly.

Facebook just wants to show you sensationalist trash and call it "engagement."

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Name one other time in history when memes could be spread and amplified at the same rate and level as through social media.

Europe survived the invention of the printing press just fine. The parallels between the internet and the printing press are many.

Wasn't aware that the printing press could instantaneously distribute material to a majority of the people on Earth within seconds, at virtually no cost.

The parallels between the Internet and the printing press may be many, but the differences are IMO vastly greater.

Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't

#40
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't post unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments to HN, even when something feels Orwellian. It doesn't help.

Okay may be lol is not really HN style. But how is the above comment flame bait. It just calls the article calling for Orwellian measures which it does by any reasonable standard (thought police?).

When the topic is inflammatory and a comment consists of name-calling and rhetoric, that's flamebait. We want curious, thoughtful conversation here—comments should add new information, not repeat well-trodden paths.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Post reply on HN