Live data from Hacker News

Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

medium.com

31–40 of 53 posts

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#31

According to the theory of the author, I've found that Twitter can be used like an actual social network and I do use it like this with a group of friends. It is kind of a cluster and anyone can join only by answering our tweets and hanging out.

I think twitter has a lot of potential, more than just a social network

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#33

I don't want Facebook to show me anything that isn't posted by one of my friends... are there any settings that allows that? Sure it's kind of interesting to look at a bear being washed by a human, but who cares.

https://socialfixer.com/ has a lot of helpful settings to that effect.

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#35

Is there now a gap for a new social platform that goes back to chronologically ordered content from those you choose to follow/friend rather than algorithmically curated content from other sources designed to lure you in?

There is, but anyone who would fund it would require it to be monetized in the same way. This situation will continue to persist until people are willing to pay for such a service, and subvert the advertising motive. And, even then, we have the example of cable to show us that ads will probably creep back in, and come to dominate it all over again. When people are willing to drive dump trucks full of money to your loading dock, what else can you do?

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#37

Reminds me of this article that had been submitted a couple times in recent months, "User Engagement" is code for "Addiction" https://medium.com/swlh/user-engagement-is-code-for-addictio... I hope we can come up with a new phrase that sticks for these. Some good ones have been posted here in the comments. Ideally, an altruistic entity will trademark them.

"User Engagement Networks" Sounds perfectly fine to me. At least there would be an idea of what these apps are trying to accomplish at the expense of the user.

"User Engagement and Data Collection Networks"

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#38

Is there now a gap for a new social platform that goes back to chronologically ordered content from those you choose to follow/friend rather than algorithmically curated content from other sources designed to lure you in?

You just described the Fediverse.

https://fediverse.party/en/fediverse

Re: Social networks neither ‘social’ nor ‘networks’ – what should we call them?

#40

Is there now a gap for a new social platform that goes back to chronologically ordered content from those you choose to follow/friend rather than algorithmically curated content from other sources designed to lure you in?

There is, but anyone who would fund it would require it to be monetized in the same way. This situation will continue to persist until people are willing to pay for such a service, and subvert the advertising motive. And, even then, we have the example of cable to show us that ads will probably creep back in, and come to dominate it all over again. When people are willing to drive dump trucks full of money to your lo…

Very true. I have to confess to a very leading question there, as I am building exactly this and thinking long and hard about monetisation. I do like the cable analogy and think it's very true.

I think ads can be done better/more ethically than currently as well though - whether that be less of them, less "native" so they don't appear exactly like posts from your family/friends and with less granular targeting - whether advertisers would go for it is another matter entirely though...

Post reply on HN