Live data from Hacker News

In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

sparktoro.com

31–40 of 412 posts

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#31

Google results have gotten dramatically worse over this last decade. Google now seems to fixate on the most common terms in my query and returns the most generic results for my geographic area. And, it seems like quotes and the old google-fu techniques are just ignored or are no longer functional. There are a whole host of factors behind this, but I'm certain that the switch to Natural Language Processing / Semantic…

I was kinda thinking the same too until I went back and gave bing and DDG a shot and well, Google is still way better for my searches. I think its more of the seo spam that popping up thats making the results look less useful.

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#32
I suspect a bunch of people might jump on the bandwagon that this is Google repackaging others' content into search snippets and robbing their sites of traffic.

No doubt there's some truth to that, but I'd like to indulge in a slightly different flavour of Google bashing on this occasion.

The reason I often don't click through on search results is that the search results are garbage - either irrelevant or poor quality. I'm in the midst of refurbing and redecorating my house. Often I'll need to do some research on topics related to that, and when I do that I often find I need to refine my search query to find anything of relevance, even sometimes digging through several pages of results manually to find a really useful page.

And then there's work: I still haven't found any answers on this, but one of the things that's on my mind about becoming a more senior business leader is that I feel like I'm changing as a person. I feel like the way I think about problems and people is changing. That's to some extent to be expected, but the issue is I'm feeling ambivalent about some of the changes I perceive.

So it's about the effect that leadership has on the leader (selfish, I realise).

But when I start searching around this topic, what does Google want to show me? Pages and pages of results about change management or, when it's being marginally less of a village idiot, pages and pages of results about leadership styles and changing leadership style. Neither of these is what I'm talking about.

A human will understand that, but Google doesn't, and I'm finding that increasingly to be a problem when I'm looking for information: either, (i) my results are overwhelmed with low-grade spammy SEO'd to hell and back content, or (ii) Google's AI is too bloody stupid and pig-ignorant to understand what I'm talking about.

Hence I don't click through on the search results the majority of the time.

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#34

Don't ogle Google, https://duckduckgo.com instead.

Doesn't DDG do the same thing? DDG will show a snippet from Wikipedia, has a built in calculator, built in timer, and so on...

Sure, Google also has a flight tracker widget, but it's not that much worse than DDG. If you really want no widgets or inline responses, https://www.startpage.com/ has that.

EDIT: Startpage does have a time widget (search for "time in "), but doesn't have a calculator, timer, or literally anything else. How odd...

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#38
Many moons ago, I put a ton of work into a (now defunct) content site that provided specific information in a small vertical. Each post took hours, but I enjoyed writing the articles, and the revenue from the ads was enough to enjoy a little extra cash every month (we're talking just about enough to cover a car payment, for context).

Google decided they liked a lot of the content and started providing it in their knowledge graph. It was initially great to be validated and the link to my content at the top of the search result was pretty cool to see. But it did tank traffic, as Google scraping my content and giving it away at the top of their search result page meant people didn't need to navigate to my site.

Felt pretty terrible, if I'm being honest, but I also have always subscribed to understanding the risks for relying on other networks for my own benefit.

BUT!!!

As a regular user of search engines, I love getting the answer super fast without necessarily having to guess what sort of ad-trap I'll have to navigate to get the answer I'm looking for on some random content site.

As a user, when I'm asking some non-critical question, it's nice to just get a snappy answer. I appreciate it.

The problem of course arises when content creators stop making the content for Google to scrape and index, what then?

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#39
post #28

Google results have gotten dramatically worse over this last decade. Google now seems to fixate on the most common terms in my query and returns the most generic results for my geographic area. And, it seems like quotes and the old google-fu techniques are just ignored or are no longer functional. There are a whole host of factors behind this, but I'm certain that the switch to Natural Language Processing / Semantic…

My guess is that you're part of an unprofitable long tail. Why optimize for your use case when they can capture customers that bring more money with far less effort? I wager that most people don't perceive a decline in search results quality. At least not to an extent where they'd notice and switch to using Bing.

I'd guess because people who are looking for something specific, are more likely to buy the damn thing if they find it, if it's something buyable.

Re: In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click

#40

Often I'm looking for a Wikipedia page, and it seems that in the past year or so Wikipedia pages have been moved way down on the first page of search results, especially if the topic is a medical one.

I noticed this too and now suffix any query that I think Wikipedia is best at with “wiki.”

This is faster for me that opening Wikipedia and searching.

Post reply on HN