Interesting how the article doesn't mention any game of whac-a-mole to root out leftist extremism.
Cognitive dissonance. Populations doesn't know what to think anymore if they think at all.
31–40 of 118 posts
Interesting how the article doesn't mention any game of whac-a-mole to root out leftist extremism.
Cognitive dissonance. Populations doesn't know what to think anymore if they think at all.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This used to be more or less exactly my attitude but then my mom got really into QAnon nonsense and the whole Capitol raid thing unfolded and I've become a lot more sympathetic to just banning people raving about Chinese Manchurian candidates from social media. Honestly, even when alternative news sources are easily accessible nobody reads them.
My mom got sucked into the RussiaGate hoax, so we should look into shutting down CNN and other propaganda outlets
Interesting how the article doesn't mention any game of whac-a-mole to root out leftist extremism.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average American in 2008 was not walking into a synagogue and murdering people. Let's not pretend that far-right extremism is something other than what it actually is.
The average American in 2008 wasn't setting fire to courthouses. Let's not pretend that far-left extremism is something other than what it actually is.
Interesting how the article doesn't mention any game of whac-a-mole to root out leftist extremism.
Because there's no serious left-wing insurgency anybody is worried about. There are people who like posting guillotine images on Twitter but little real-world impact.
Mirriam-Webster defines "extremism" [1] as "advocacy of extreme measures or views : radicalism" By this definition, extremism and radicalism are equivocated. However, I know many people on the "left" presently identify as radicals ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_left ). The article differentiates between the terms "extremism" and "radicalism" by assigning a "political-right" label to "extremists" and a "polit…
I think you have to play pretty fast and loose with the groups involved to come to these conclusions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average American in 2008 wasn't setting fire to courthouses. Let's not pretend that far-left extremism is something other than what it actually is.
Oh and also, nearly killing a US representative with a semiautomatic rifle.
Extremism is relative. The opinions of an average American in 2008 would be labelled "far-right" today (see: opposition to gay marriage, transgenderism, support for colorblindness, I could go on). Sooner or later, people will see that it's a fool's errand keeping up with this runaway train of an overton window.
Support for colour-blindness is far-right? Who knew MLK was such a far right extremist eh?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average American in 2008 was not walking into a synagogue and murdering people. Let's not pretend that far-right extremism is something other than what it actually is.
FYI: In 2009 a 88-year-old white supremacist started murdering people in the Holocaust Memorial Museum [0] That period was also heavily dominated by Islamophobia in the US with firebomb attacks on Islamic Centers and random brown people getting assaulted and called "terrorists". Heck, a mere 4 days after 9/11 happened a Sikh was shot for being mistaken as an Arab Muslim due to his turban [1]. Which actually makes no…
Extremism is relative. The opinions of an average American in 2008 would be labelled "far-right" today (see: opposition to gay marriage, transgenderism, support for colorblindness, I could go on). Sooner or later, people will see that it's a fool's errand keeping up with this runaway train of an overton window.
Support for colour-blindness is far-right? Who knew MLK was such a far right extremist eh?