Off-topic, but one thing that puzzles me is the rather widespread believe that setting up a colony in Mars will somehow save humanity. IMHO, exposing humans and their descendants for life to different conditions of gravity, radiation and overall ecosystem, will make them evolve in ways that will generate a totally different species in very few hundred years. So it will be just a matter of time, until an orange-colore…
Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
31–36 of 36 posts
Re: Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
#32Off-topic, but one thing that puzzles me is the rather widespread believe that setting up a colony in Mars will somehow save humanity. IMHO, exposing humans and their descendants for life to different conditions of gravity, radiation and overall ecosystem, will make them evolve in ways that will generate a totally different species in very few hundred years. So it will be just a matter of time, until an orange-colore…
> So a colony in Mars maybe preserves intelligent life with roots in the human species, but I do not think it will preserve the human species as we know it. That's sufficient for my desires of making humanity multiplanitary (and eventually spanning multiple solar systems). I don't desire freezing humanity as it exists today, I desire ensuring the human project continue as long as we can keep it going.
Re: Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
#33Making any kind of physical good or service is more than a decent challenge, especially if for a higher purpose!
So I wish you the best.
Re: Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
#34> It’s also the first launch vehicle to offer return from orbit “down-mass” capacit Wasn't the shuttle first? What about Dream Chaser? Is your second stage designed to fly on top of New Glenn's first stage? Do the fins on the New Glenn provide enough authority to counteract the control surfaces on your stage? Or are you planning on flying encapsulated like Dream Chaser does?
Sorry for the confusion! There are plenty of space vehicles that have had "down-mass" capacity - Gemini, Soyuz, Apollo, Dragon, Shuttle, X-37B, etc. They are all spacecraft, although Shuttle is a close in-between. The distinction here is this is a true upper stage, which can also return items from orbit. We are looking to serve a complementary market to New Glenn and are not planning to fly on that vehicle.
So the X-37 has a down-mass capacity. That means it has either docked or at least intercepted with something else in space close enough to transfer material. I was unaware that it could perform such maneuvers. I certainly haven't read anything in the open source about such missions.
Re: Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
#35Off-topic, but one thing that puzzles me is the rather widespread believe that setting up a colony in Mars will somehow save humanity. IMHO, exposing humans and their descendants for life to different conditions of gravity, radiation and overall ecosystem, will make them evolve in ways that will generate a totally different species in very few hundred years. So it will be just a matter of time, until an orange-colore…
non of that matters if life on earth is gone which is the primary reason for having a colony in Mars
Re: Launch HN: Stoke (YC W21) – Low cost, on-demand delivery to and from space
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So a colony in Mars maybe preserves intelligent life with roots in the human species, but I do not think it will preserve the human species as we know it. That's sufficient for my desires of making humanity multiplanitary (and eventually spanning multiple solar systems). I don't desire freezing humanity as it exists today, I desire ensuring the human project continue as long as we can keep it going.
It must be said, though, that Mars is a place where it is easier to freeze humans than not.
And in 10,000 years an asteroid could hit earth and create an impact winter on earth that makes it so that Earth is a place where it is easier to freeze humans than not.
Creating a backup for humanity on another planet isn't about the next 500 years. It's about the next 100,000 years.
And creating a backup for humanity in another solar system isn't about the next 100,000 years, it's about the next 100,000,000 years.
In those kinds of timeframe, spending 1,000 years to terraform Mars is pretty quick.