Live data from Hacker News

Most M1 Macs appear to have a serious SSD wear defect

twitter.com

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: Most M1 Macs appear to have a serious SSD wear defect

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just assumed that this was some deep "app nap", where its effectively swapping the entire state of an inactive app to disk. That would likely explain why the usage is scaling with available RAM, rather than storage space. I get that its a much higher wear than we would traditionally expect, but given I have 8GB of RAM that seems near inexhaustible., maybe it just a different approach to memory management, permitted…

So, going back over the numbers and with a 256GB 3% user confirmed on Twitter, it seems like the ratings are: 2TB model: 5000TBW 256GB model: 2000TBW That means that, at the worst known rate that David had (150TB in 2 months), a 256GB drive would reach lifetime writes in ~2 years. That's still way too fast, so this is still something Apple needs to adjust if it is happening to people (and given what he told me about…

Those ratings are unrealistic, suggest 8000 write cycle flash for the small drive.

Re: Most M1 Macs appear to have a serious SSD wear defect

#32
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Instead of "assuming", I checked my machine. I have a 256GB version with 8GB RAM. I received it 3 days after launch, and it has been used consistently for iOS, android and web development. It is showing 1% "Used" - the same figure as the OP. Im not sure where you are getting 3% from.

"Percentage used" might be as accurate as Cellphone reception bars. What is really important is the SSD capacity * ~600 / Bytes written and quality of wear leveling firmware in Apple SSD.

Maybe so, but it’s the figure manufacturers use in their warranty
Post reply on HN