Live data from Hacker News

The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

bugs.xdavidhu.me

31–40 of 112 posts

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#31

doesn't google employ the elite of world programming? how can such stuff even happen? honest question.

Most bugs happen at the boundaries between what different people are working on. They're often process and architecture issues rather than programming issues. Security bugs often have this flavor.

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, Google employs far too many developers for the median to be close to 'elite'. I'm sure there are elite teams at Google, but I very much doubt the average Googler is, and that's probably been the case for a decade at this point. The famous Rob Pike quote sums it up quite well: > The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probab…

I think Rob Pike's commentary on Go is why I decided to go into research. Google hires kilotons of developers and pays them gigadollars every year, then makes them work in dumbed-down languages because they can't be trusted with power tools. How has our industry gone so far astray that we pay people hundreds of thousands of dollars a year when they can't even understand generics? In what universe does it make sense t…

The skills the median google engineer needs can absolutely be learned in three months at a boot camp but simultaneously those skills are worth a million a year to google. There's massive returns to scale of the infrastructure for effective software development, but very few organisations have figured it out.

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, Google employs far too many developers for the median to be close to 'elite'. I'm sure there are elite teams at Google, but I very much doubt the average Googler is, and that's probably been the case for a decade at this point. The famous Rob Pike quote sums it up quite well: > The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probab…

I think Rob Pike's commentary on Go is why I decided to go into research. Google hires kilotons of developers and pays them gigadollars every year, then makes them work in dumbed-down languages because they can't be trusted with power tools. How has our industry gone so far astray that we pay people hundreds of thousands of dollars a year when they can't even understand generics? In what universe does it make sense t…

>can't understand generics

Is this really true? We learned about generics in college so I assumed that everyone knew it (especially if they work at Google).

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, Google employs far too many developers for the median to be close to 'elite'. I'm sure there are elite teams at Google, but I very much doubt the average Googler is, and that's probably been the case for a decade at this point. The famous Rob Pike quote sums it up quite well: > The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probab…

I think Rob Pike's commentary on Go is why I decided to go into research. Google hires kilotons of developers and pays them gigadollars every year, then makes them work in dumbed-down languages because they can't be trusted with power tools. How has our industry gone so far astray that we pay people hundreds of thousands of dollars a year when they can't even understand generics? In what universe does it make sense t…

Professionals with many years of experience could and would still make mistakes with C and C++. And many mistakes are very costly at Google's scale.

Wanting to make the situation better through a simpler, safer fit-for-purpose tool doesn't mean an industry is flawed anymore than the prevalence of sawstops means that carpentry is flawed.

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#37
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not about you, it's about your parents and grandparents.

What do you mean by that?

It's an ageist way of saying that this exploit is less critical for people who take proactive counter-measures, and more affects less technically inclined or security-minded people.

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#38
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean by that?

It's an ageist way of saying that this exploit is less critical for people who take proactive counter-measures, and more affects less technically inclined or security-minded people.

Ageist how? Who says you have to be a certain age to be a parent or grandparent? Sounds very ageist to me.

And that is an example of how political correctness is an arms race.

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#39
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not about you, it's about your parents and grandparents.

What do you mean by that?

It is a bit an "elitist" comment in the beginning of the thread. The original comment can easily be interpreted (whether it was intended like that or not ...) as "there's no problem, I'm not affected, easy to avoid" to which the GP reacted "well, yeah, good for you, but other less tach davy people won't do" to which I would append "and they shouldn't have to. We should try to get such traps out of the net. Joe Average should be able to use the net in a productive and safe way"

Re: The embedded YouTube player told me what you were watching

#40
post #9

EDIT: never mind Should probably be (2019), as the bug has been fixed since (as noted at the bottom of TFA).

Every bounty bug write up I've seen on HN was after it had been long fixed, so that should be a given when you see a write up like this.

I misinterpreted the "2019, October 11, 00:16" to indicate when the following text was written.
Post reply on HN