Live data from Hacker News

I received my first donation on my open-source side project

gourav.io

31–40 of 110 posts

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#31
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you say something like "Dont worry its not illegal you'll be fine" you really need a link to some proof. :)

https://is.fi/taloussanomat/art-2000001494059.html https://rescue.fi/article.php/20070131_effi It was only district court but the prosecutor did not seek the court of appeals (which they legally have to do if there's a chance their view might succeed), leaving the precedent.

So, just wondering - how important is precedent normally in Finnish Law?

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#32
I love stories like this. Most folks aren't in open source for the returns, and any form of gratitude is uplifting and incredibly motivating. I've got my fingers in so many open source pies that it's silly, but I do it because I love it. Yeah, some really big corps use my stuff and a few packages have millions of weekly downloads, but I'm not doing it for the money. It helps keep my skills and thinking fresh, networks me with a ton of people worldwide, improves my soft skills with every interaction, and makes me a better cooperative collaborator. I receive exactly $5.80 a month in donations (via Patreon) and I'm just happy that two people thought enough of my work to send me a few duckets from their hard-earned income every month. I'll happily take that beer money and the personal development that comes with it as a reward.

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#33
post #22
post #20

It makes me sad to see developers donating time and effort to support an ecosystem (VSCode) built explicitly to spy on users and promote proprietary software. The fact that VSC's core is released under an open source license is irrelevant to the harm that is being done.

Can you elaborate? As for as I've seen, disabling telemetry in VSCode is pretty straight forward.

Opt-out telemetry, as opposed to opt-in telemetry, usually violates GDPR. This issue is being discussed at https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/47284

VSCodium is recommended as an alternative https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#34
I know this feeling, seeing people pay for your free software! It's very rewarding, and also a sign that some people got huge value from your hard work. Even if it's symbolic, or just enough to cover the server costs, it's what motivates me to continue. Still, I wish more companies would donate to support the massive amount of open-source software and libraries we all use every day. I understand that making a company pay for something free is a challenge. But come on, they can pay vast amount of money for getting support for open-source softwares, support they will probably never use... :)

(Project on which I received donation: https://github.com/mockoon/mockoon)

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#35

I know that feeling. Few years back someone asked me if I accept Bitcoin as donation for an SDK I wrote https://github.com/namaggarwal/splitwise It felt so good that I went ahead and create a wallet and he donated me some fractional BTC. It wasn't much at that time but it motivated me a lot.

hope you kept it and sold it a few days ago when BTC hit 40K USD. yes?

Any sane person at the time would have sold it immediately for $50

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#36
post #30
post #24

Accepting Monero and Bitcoin costs you nothing and is a great way of solicitating donations as cryptocurrency users are historically massive donors.

There's always a time cost with financial things, at least. Some tax authority probably expects you to track and report that income, and will want their share.

We are not talking about hundreds or thousands of dollars here, are we?

Do you get in trouble with the Tax Man because you tip your server at a restaurant or gives some spare change to the someone on the street?

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#38
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's always a time cost with financial things, at least. Some tax authority probably expects you to track and report that income, and will want their share.

We are not talking about hundreds or thousands of dollars here, are we? Do you get in trouble with the Tax Man because you tip your server at a restaurant or gives some spare change to the someone on the street?

Giving? No.

Receiving and not reporting? Maybe, depending on local laws and how zealous the tax enforcer is. This probably falls into the category of "Not allowed, but too small to worry about." That works fine, until they decide to audit you for some other reason.

Re: I received my first donation on my open-source side project

#40
post #4

I’m pretty excited about the GitHub Sponsors feature opening up worldwide, think it can actually help foster a culture of contributing back to the people whose work we all use. They’ve got an interesting page where they show you all the sponsorable projects you depend on, sorted by the most heavily depended-on projects first. Besides voluntary contributions I want to see maintainers refusing to take feature requests…

The biggest oppurtunity would be to allow assigning money for tasks and solutions. Like there are so many really good projects with a lot of open issues and good ideas on things to improve a library/framework/project. The ability to say, hey, i am the project owner and i would love to add this cool feature to my library which is complicated, you can donate for this feature, like crowdfunding for software.

Or the other case. I have created many pull requests in the past which had been only a few lines to fix an existing bug but they did never merge it. Sometimes i received notifications for years from other people asking why it is not meged and they had to fork (and maintain) it to fix this bug. Just saying here are 50$ if you merge it would be a life-saver. No more maintaining a fork just to fix a bug which is not a priority of the owner who prefers adding more and more features.

My point is open source does not need to be free work from the maintainer. A platform like github could change the game by allowing people to get a small payment for what they are doing. But not like their actual plan by just giving them money, i want to connect it to a "problem" to solve (resolve issue, add feature, merge pr, ...)

Post reply on HN