Live data from Hacker News

The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

theatlantic.com

31–40 of 62 posts

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#31
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

Fwiw, I've never really liked two spaces after a period and rereading that confirms it.

To me it causes some mild confusion (if that's the right word — maybe too strong a word) with paragraph breaks. It's just too big a gap. For me it decreases readability if anything.

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#32
From a guy who learned, in high school, to set type and print pages the old fashioned way, with metal type. It was retro even back then. But what an art!

From my perspective the very concept of a typewriter-style space is an abomination wrought upon printing by the typewriter. Of course, typewriters were tremendously useful devices. I have no quarrel with them other than that.

Spaces in the retro printer world: There's this concept of the "em" or quad space. It is a square hunk of metal the same height as the letters in the typeface. We still have it in   and css rules like line-height: 1.25em;

We had five kinds of space in the lower case of the typeface. The "case" was a tray with dividers. If I remember right, they were

-- em (quad)  

-- en (half a quad)  

-- thick ( ~ 1/4 of a quad) the ordinary space and   in most fonts.

-- middle ( ~ 1/5 of a quad)  

-- thin ( ~ 1/6 of a quad in most typefaces)

-- numberspace (the same width as the numerals in the typeface, an early nod to

 for tables.

Notice that the precise widths of the thicks, middles, and thins are determined by the typeface's designer. Then and now.

Our teacher told us to set up body copy with thicks between words.

We then justified each line manually by putting two thins in place of a middle to add space, or one thin to remove space. Choosing where to adjust the space was an art. It was good to avoid rivers of space running down the page. (Adobe InDesign gives enough control to do this; I don't think other programs do.)

AFTER SENTENCES, we used ens for most copy, and ems for poetry and that sort of thing. I am pretty sure the two-space typewriter convention grew out of printers' ens or ems after sentences.

In the 21st century digital typefaces have contextual glyphs. That makes it easy for the FONT DESIGNER to choose the default spacing between sentences. That's as it should be. The rest of us should pass dot space to the font. The font designer "owns" legibility.

I, for one, have had a heck of a time unlearning the dot space space sequence I learned in high-school typing class.

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#33
post #31
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

Fwiw, I've never really liked two spaces after a period and rereading that confirms it. To me it causes some mild confusion (if that's the right word — maybe too strong a word) with paragraph breaks. It's just too big a gap. For me it decreases readability if anything.

The dot symbol has ambiguity without extra spaces.

  ... Andrew W. Kent ...
  ... Andrew W.  Kent ...
Mean different things. It’s rarely an issue, and not necessarily used correctly, but it is still a valuable tool.

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#34
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

> I would advocate that the extra spacing should be handled at presentation time. Not as part of the content itself. TeX/LaTeX attempts to do this, IIRC. I know there are sigils to force that one way or the other when it guesses wrong. I'm a 2-spacer, being of a certain age and having learned to type in school on an actual typewriter. I'm also heavily invested in the Web, and I get that multiple spaces are folded int…

I had a grudging and bitter period, decades back when writing a lot of HTML, of putting a non-breaking space after a regular space finishing a sentence, just so I could get that extra space visible. I finally folded on that one.

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#35
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

> I would advocate that the extra spacing should be handled at presentation time. Not as part of the content itself. TeX/LaTeX attempts to do this, IIRC. I know there are sigils to force that one way or the other when it guesses wrong. I'm a 2-spacer, being of a certain age and having learned to type in school on an actual typewriter. I'm also heavily invested in the Web, and I get that multiple spaces are folded int…

> I'm a 2-spacer, being of a certain age and having learned to type in school on an actual typewriter.

Yes, from posts with double-spaces I can usually tell that the author is over a certain age (I would put them at baby-boomer or near baby-boomer).

I am guilty of having been taught that way when taking Typing class in school as well.

I have since dropped it though since we no longer live in a monospace world (I know, I hear you saying, "Speak for yourself," but I am excepting coding).

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#36
Two spaces, like the Oxford Comma, reduce ambiguity and aid in visually parsing text information.

As a side benefit, that extra space can help software identify a sentence vs a line which contains something like Mr. Bob. With a two-space system, Mr. Bob would be part of one sentence. In a one-space system, the software cannot tell if the sentence ends at Mr. with the next sentence beginning as "Bob ..."

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#38
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

I switched to single spacing about 15 years ago when I was reading about typography for legal writing. Now I find two-spacing jarring. Also, when seeing two-spacing I somewhat irrationally get the feeling that the writer is old-fashioned or uninformed.

I understand the claim that two-spacing makes it easier to read because it separates sentences. But that is what the period does. Sentences are supposed to flow together.

Paragraphs are for separating.

And from the linked article:

“I’ve gotten a lot of flak for using a mono-spaced font (Courier New) in the study,” said Johnson.

Flak? I think using monospace font invalidates the conclusion of study.

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#39
post #31
post #5

I'm surprised the article did not show the difference. Here it is: 1 space after period === I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal infor…

Fwiw, I've never really liked two spaces after a period and rereading that confirms it. To me it causes some mild confusion (if that's the right word — maybe too strong a word) with paragraph breaks. It's just too big a gap. For me it decreases readability if anything.

Clearlyweshouldresurrectscriptocontnua.

Whitespace is frippery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scriptio_continua

Re: The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period (2018)

#40

Is this just an American thing? I was educated in the UK and it never once came up (we use a single space), nor have I heard of it anywhere except online conversations with Americans.

I'm not sure about it being restricted to americans, but yes, that is how I was taught in public schools. I'm from the U.S.
Post reply on HN