China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
31–40 of 145 posts
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#32They define 4,000-yuan (about $609) as the national poverty line. Significant milestone. The average annual net income of impoverished people in these nine counties has risen to 11,487 yuan (about $1,740)
Presumably $1740 per annum in rural China is enough to meet basic needs.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#33>moderately prosperous society in all respects. >satisfaction rate among locals was over 99 percent >About 1.88 million people living in poor mountainous areas have been relocated to urban areas >Various supporting measures have been taken to ensure that at least one person on average in each relocated household gets employed. Reads like an Onion article.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
My country had 99% election approval during communism as well. China propably made some progress, but numbers are just propaganda. If anything certain muslim regions are far from happy.
Ah, the "China is exactly like 1979 Poland" gambit. https://twitter.com/fullhomosexual/status/132880415416539136... The downfall of the US is that we're SO CERTAIN that our way is the only right and good way, and it gives us blind spots.
lmao
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cite a reason why you'd think it's dumb. Denying that China has so far been very successful is a fallacy. Compare China to India, China was behind. Now it has leapfrogged ahead. It is yet to be seen if China can reach the developed country status, which would require dethroning the dollar as the world reserve currency. However, just because China has been successful in the past doesn't mean it will be able to achieve…
[flagged]
China continues to bully its regional neighbors like Vietnam over dubious claims to the regional seas.
Now, to be fair, I'm typing this on land formerly inhabited by American Indians, in a nation with a history of lying to start wars and exploiting foreign nations for gain. But at least I am able to discuss these issues and push for changes to keep those atrocities from happening again.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
My country had 99% election approval during communism as well. China propably made some progress, but numbers are just propaganda. If anything certain muslim regions are far from happy.
Ah, the "China is exactly like 1979 Poland" gambit. https://twitter.com/fullhomosexual/status/132880415416539136... The downfall of the US is that we're SO CERTAIN that our way is the only right and good way, and it gives us blind spots.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#37And they also supposedly only have 93k confirmed COVID cases. Not sure I believe this.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#38Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#39Not sure how many of the people on this thread have actually been or lived in China. I have lived there about 2 years and travelled fairly extensively. I cannot speak to these specific villages, but the amount of people lifted out of poverty in China in the last 50 years is probably one of the greatest achievements in human history along with modern science, medicine and rule of law.
Re: China delists all remaining poverty-stricken counties
#40Economics is a zero-sum-game; if they lifted everyone in China out of poverty, then poverty is exported to other countries or the nature paid all the costs.
Edit:
Nature is a silent sufferer in the economics. It acted as cushion to our misadventures, a-bomb(wars), oil-spills, co2 & other gases, industrial wastes, nuclear wastes.
For a person to become rich, they have to earn profit dishonestly; if profit is shared equally nobody is richer. Somebody is getting short end of the stick to make someone else richer.
If everyone is self-sufficient through out their lives, then technically there is enough to go around. Otherwise, one who holds the resource in high demand won't share it fairly.
Simply put : Income disparity will thrive in resource hungry society where resources are held by few members. Even in self-sufficiency, if population grows then nature has to pay the price. Resources are finite for all kinds of life on earth. If one thrives some other suffers.
Anyway, now it's downvoted; wasted my time wording it.