Live data from Hacker News

How should we pursue human longevity?

milan.cvitkovic.net

31–33 of 33 posts

Re: How should we pursue human longevity?

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand this fundamental anti-human worldview. People are able to change their mind. Just think about how much more accepted homosexuality is today compared to 25 years ago. I changed during the last 10 years, everyone else I know did as well. Did you? Think about how much people will change, how many lives they will live over 300 years. Also keep in mind a society that is able to develop and sustain anti-…

> Just think about how much more accepted homosexuality is today compared to 25 years ago. Is that because older people willingly changed their views, or older people died and younger people replaced them? I suspect 90% of that change is from generational shifts, not people learning with time. In other words, the old died out and the young replaced them. In my anecdotal experience, most older people I know aren't any…

People don't enter this world with random ideas. The fact is: Someone has to change their mind and think something new. Either the old or the young.

I find the notion that old people are all stupid, racist bastards very insulting, even though I am under 30. Older people tend to be happier, kinder and have more perspective. Imagine how much more wisdom, knowledge and skill people could accumulate if they did not die so young. If they lived, what would Arthur C. Clarke, John von Neumann and Ludwig van Beethoven be up to today?

It is true young people in our world are often more radical. For better and worse. And for every good change there are other examples where young people changed the world for the worse. The nazis and communists were quite young when they rose to power.

Moreover, I can only reiterate. A fixed world assumption is not valid here. A world with little or no aging will be vastly different.

Re: How should we pursue human longevity?

#32

Here is another bad argument missing from appendix: Organisms are evolved to utilise short life-spans to quickly adapt changing environmental conditions. Let’s assume humanity finds a cure to death and also without dwelling into dystopia that this finding is cheaply available to everyone. What will most likely happen is that bad ideas will haunt the humanity forever as older generations won’t die and remove their bad…

> Organisms are evolved to utilise short life-spans to quickly adapt changing environmental conditions

They don't utilize short life span, but rapid replication

For many organisms short life span is simply a byproduct of their biology, but take an immortal mosquito and its rapidly evolving offspring will adapt as well as the immortal father did.

Of course immortal mosquitos would never be possible because the equilibrium would collapse if too many mosquitos are alive in a limited resources pool

But humans are not mosquitos

Re: How should we pursue human longevity?

#33

Delighted to see that despite the whole point of the piece being to NOT discuss the arguments for/against longevity, basically all the comments are about that. ;)

> How should we pursue human longevity? >> whole point of the piece being to NOT discuss the arguments for/against longevity, basically all the comments are about that. Step one: Learn to Weaponized Autism better? I'd still be working on a technology that allows longevity to be explored more at different levels. Why do we not have a clearer way forward? Why are Instagramers not pushing what we have more? Why is there…

You can’t cure yourself of aging with some pills from the dark web.
Post reply on HN