I've posted this before, but here's one service I can absolutely foresee: Automated job applications and Automated job listings Companies will use GPT-3 to generate job listings, and some company will curate a big database of good job applications (i.e those that have landed someone a job), and make a service where you feed in the listing, and out comes job application / letter.
Interesting thought. I would assume that job listings is easier to generate because it's a minimum threshold task, whereas job applications would be orders of magnitude harder because having a good application and being accepted to a job is weakly correlated at most.
Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
31–40 of 80 posts
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#32I wouldn't be surprised if the result of the next election in a country would be decided by a Transformer based deep neural network. The dictator in my country is already paying stupid people to write stupid comments, GPT-3 is already over their level.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#33I've posted this before, but here's one service I can absolutely foresee: Automated job applications and Automated job listings Companies will use GPT-3 to generate job listings, and some company will curate a big database of good job applications (i.e those that have landed someone a job), and make a service where you feed in the listing, and out comes job application / letter.
Interesting thought. I would assume that job listings is easier to generate because it's a minimum threshold task, whereas job applications would be orders of magnitude harder because having a good application and being accepted to a job is weakly correlated at most.
A lot of posters here seem to complain (or have, for the past weeks) the GPT-3 output comes off as mediocre, but I'd wager that a lot of the job applications we see today are worse than mediocre, often times horrible.
It sucks that the end result would be some standoff between ML-software that reads job applications, written by some other ML-software, but there's lots of hours to be saved - from the human standpoint.
If I don't have to write 10 letters, then that's probably 10 hours saved from my part - as I easily use an hour to write a tailored job letter.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#34I wouldn't be surprised if the result of the next election in a country would be decided by a Transformer based deep neural network. The dictator in my country is already paying stupid people to write stupid comments, GPT-3 is already over their level.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#35If not, then its pretty easy for GPT-3 to copy paste existing human written texts and just prove that it can write like a human.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting thought. I would assume that job listings is easier to generate because it's a minimum threshold task, whereas job applications would be orders of magnitude harder because having a good application and being accepted to a job is weakly correlated at most.
That's the thing, writing job applications sucks - and it's time consuming - which is why too many resort to just copy/pasting the same template for many jobs, which obviously shows if you've ever read a job application before. A lot of posters here seem to complain (or have, for the past weeks) the GPT-3 output comes off as mediocre , but I'd wager that a lot of the job applications we see today are worse than medio…
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#37For all the texts generated by GPT3, is anyone verifying that it's not just copy pasting paragraphs from previous seen texts? (like by, searching n-grams or even just googling it?) If not, then its pretty easy for GPT-3 to copy paste existing human written texts and just prove that it can write like a human.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#38Not sure why you're being downvoted.
It's not downvote worthy, but it is cringey.
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#39I feel like GPT-3 is going to unleash the next wave of SEO spam. Content spinning will be taken to the next level, will Google be able to detect GPT-3 content?
Re: Show HN: Humans vs AI – A/B testing GPT-3
#40I'm a little disappointed that the landing page for this challenge itself doesn't seem to be a live a/b test with live results for how much submissions are garnered through the human version of the page versus the gpt-3 one. Fun challenge though !
Let's see which one gets more participation :)