Live data from Hacker News

On Trouser Pockets

sambleckley.com

31–40 of 400 posts

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#31
When I’m not wearing comfy “tech pants” with extra internal pockets (Prana, REI, and so on) I’ve been wearing a lot of blazers. Extra pockets that, blessedly, aren’t in my pants; dresses you up but not so much that people in my hickish ‘burbs are put off, rather than dressing you down like a hoodie. Appropriate in almost all weather, if you’ve got the right kinds of cloth and weight. Love ‘em.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#32

He’s reinvented the knife pocket in carpenter jeans. There’s also usually a loop nearby for hanging a hammer so you don’t have to walk around with your tool bags.

Particularly when climbing ladders. Anyone who’s ever gone up a ladder and felt like they needed a third hand for carrying crap has experienced why the hammer loop exists. Plus securing it when you’re up there so your dumb ass doesn’t knock it on someone’s head :-)

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#33
I like them. So you've eliminated side and butt pockets? I can see keeping the butt pockets as a display platform for design touches, branding etc but inseam side pockets can be discarded.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#34
post #22
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And the problem with putting cargo in your cargo pants is that it swings when you walk. I have aome great Kuhl pants with similar pocket design, but it's awkward to walk with my phone there. I could perhaps get used to it, especially if they fit a bit tighter as his seem to.

I have what over here in .uk tend to be referred to as "combat trousers", where the side pockets are reasonably spacious (I can fit a 7" tablet in one, though it then doesn't close and I can't get anything else in there) but not sufficiently so that they swing. The only annoying thing is finding ones where everything including the hip pocket linings are made of the same heavy material, there are too many where that l…

Combats also tend to be closer fitting than US "Cargo pants" and can even look quite smart.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#35
post #7

Very cool! I’ve gotten into pants-making over quarantine, I’ll have to try this out. I had never considered pockets like this before (that I remember), but when I read the title my first idea was the article’s implementation

Go for it! The main construction trick here is remembering that to put a welt pocket on the outseam means you need open access -- so you close the inseam last, opposite the usual order of things.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#36

I applaud new thinking, but his proposed solution doesn't even meet his proposed criteria. > Aesthetically, we want a clean, graceful line from hip to ankle even while holding things. How are side bulges above the knee clean and graceful? > Where is there enough support to prevent items swinging around uncomfortably? Because pants are looser around the knee than the waist, heavy items like a phone will constantly be…

> Because pants are looser around the knee than the waist, heavy items like a phone will constantly be swinging around uncomfortably down there -- same as they do in cargo pants.

You can have a "pocket-in-pocket" to avoid that problem. My Lululemon trousers [1] have that where I can fit an iPhone 8 so it stays put (I don't store my iPhone as the "double-pocket" in the pictures, it is rather a hidden pocket inside the pocket on the right hand side)

[1] https://www.eu.lululemon.com/en-lu/p/commission-pant-classic...

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#37
post #27

You seem kind of touchy on the 'cargo pocket' subject, which is the first thing that came to mind for me. Glad you found something that works for you. Google 'dockers cell phone pocket'. You can already get shorts and pants with a cell phone pocket on the side. Some very similar to yours, some zippered, some a little closer to the hip, some a little lower.

Honestly, the author seems mostly to be reacting to the name cargo pants. Thus the reeling off of associations they aggressively dislike. These are merely pants with additional pockets. Their placement being similar to cargo pants being merely a coincidence...

Yes, coincidence of reinventing the wheel. They reinvented cargo pants with pockets going inside instead outside. The purpose of the two is exactly the same: storing things. I don't care who invented cargo pants and who started wearing them first. I'm neither a pilot nor a soldier, nor am I pretending to be one, but I find them super convenient.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#38
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I felt somewhat slandered by the attack on cargo pants. I wore them in high school and still wear them to this day for comfort and convenience. There is a functional elegance of being able to have pens, a small note book, keys+wallet and phone in separate pockets easily accessible. It's like having a preponderance of tabs open, but for pants.

Wasn't meant to be an attack -- they just solve a different problem for a different demographic. Like I said -- if you can wear cargo pants at work, then these pants probably don't mean much to you.

I dunno, "fashion-as-pretend-occupation" feels like a negative connotation, sort of a "stolen valor" for professions the supposed person imagines as more prestigious or moral than what they actually do, adventurer or craftsman vs, say, insurance claims adjuster.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#39
post #25

These look very much like a pair of hiking pants I have.

Yeah it reminds me of the climbing pants I use for every day wear[0]. I buy them specifically because they have pockets with zippered side access for when sitting. This looks clean but I'd worry about stuff sliding out of the pocket, as I've had happen with medium-length waist pockets frequently over the years. [0] https://www.prana.com/p/stretch-zion-convertible-pant/M4SC99...

I was just going to say, just the the pocket on my Prana's that I wear every day. My other favorite pocket is my ski jacket breast pocket, just to the left of the main zipper. So easy to access.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#40
post #29
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cargo pants really look bad with anything in them though, except flattish items like paper money. These trousers look like an improvement. I think the next step is to reinvent the bum bag in a slightly more sartorially-elegant form.

How "bad" they look is part of the aesthetic of cargo pants. Wearing them is in part a deliberate declaration that you do not care about the aesthetic considerations.

Or that you simply have different aesthetic criteria. When did fashion start being axiomatic?
Post reply on HN