Live data from Hacker News

A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

blog.waxman.me

31–37 of 37 posts

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#31

I think he undercuts his own argument. If the idea only takes four hours to build, and the result is a commercially value product, then how can he argue the idea isn't the uniquely valuable component, and his labor is really the commodity? Does he really believe that _nobody_else_ can build it in 4 hours or so? Obviously, execution is important. But if someone has an idea that's great and doesn't require a lot of exe…

Most consumer web apps require many and frequent iterations before striking a chord with users. Therefore, the ultimate great "idea" is usually arrived at through a process of engineering and design tinkering, and not through a singular, initial spark of genius.

The main differentiators in consumer web startups tend to be: the speed and creativity with which the team can iterate, the quality of the user experience and design, and, if all goes well, the ability of the architecture to scale. The capacity to do these 3 things well is relatively rare. Finding a person or a team with these skills is exceedingly difficult (especially in this talent market).

So yeah, I do stand by my assertion that the starting-point idea is the commodity, and the ability to build and design a decently scalable web-app in 4 hours (and then get user feedback and push another version later that same day) is a rare skill---especially on the open market, since most such individuals are either well-employed at companies or working on their own.

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#32
post #13

Hang on, there are people who watched that movie and sympathized with the Winkelvii? They were a cartoon character playing up every negative stereotype of old money that exists. That's like someone sympathizing with the villain from Die Hard or something.

Something to mention is that the movie does not mirror reality and the fact that Zuck sandbagged the shit out of their project purposely screwing them over. They've received their share in court I believe, but there is a matter of morals. We don't know all the facts, but that's why this is a stupid argument.

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#33
This line of thinking is immature. If you walk in with mentalities like that or dumb filters like the one described, all you will get is strife. We already have enough of these silly dip-stick questions floating around in companies, and HR teams trying these tricks.

My advice, take time, talk, and don't work with programmers or people who make their judgements based on a movie plot. It only shows they might be emotional and very difficult to work with.

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#34
post #13

Hang on, there are people who watched that movie and sympathized with the Winkelvii? They were a cartoon character playing up every negative stereotype of old money that exists. That's like someone sympathizing with the villain from Die Hard or something.

> That's like someone sympathizing with the villain from Die Hard or something.

Hey - I sympathize with the villain from Die Hard.

He had style, a good plan, including contingencies, and was doing a reasonable job executing it. He even did an okay job adapting to the unexpected.

He was just overmatched. There's no shame in that.

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#35

Great idea. I actually weed out potential co-founders by asking if they side with the Imperial base commander or the Ewoks. If that doesn't work, I ask them if they're more of a Thelma or a Louise. Edit: let's not forget Alien vs. Predator. I don't want a guy who takes forever stalking an idea. Execution is everything, and nothing executes like a chestbursting alien.

Does anyone side with the Ewoks?

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#36

Great idea. I actually weed out potential co-founders by asking if they side with the Imperial base commander or the Ewoks. If that doesn't work, I ask them if they're more of a Thelma or a Louise. Edit: let's not forget Alien vs. Predator. I don't want a guy who takes forever stalking an idea. Execution is everything, and nothing executes like a chestbursting alien.

> Alien vs. Predator.

Few might prefer predator over alien for making efficient use of tools and gadgets than resorting to sheer brute strength.

Confirmation bias at work?

Am wondering how it works the other way. Non-technical founders looking out for technical co-founders asking similar questions. Or, maybe the banksters asking apprentice traders on what they felt about Gordon Gekko?

Re: A Simple Filter to Weed Out Non-technical Co-founders

#37
post #31

I think he undercuts his own argument. If the idea only takes four hours to build, and the result is a commercially value product, then how can he argue the idea isn't the uniquely valuable component, and his labor is really the commodity? Does he really believe that _nobody_else_ can build it in 4 hours or so? Obviously, execution is important. But if someone has an idea that's great and doesn't require a lot of exe…

Most consumer web apps require many and frequent iterations before striking a chord with users. Therefore, the ultimate great "idea" is usually arrived at through a process of engineering and design tinkering, and not through a singular, initial spark of genius. The main differentiators in consumer web startups tend to be: the speed and creativity with which the team can iterate, the quality of the user experience an…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN