Live data from Hacker News

SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 42 posts

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#32

First off, I LOVE the idea. I think serial entrepreneurs like myself NEED this and it will grow into a thriving community of benevolent contributors (and hopefully less flaming) while I think it would be great to see it built from scratch putting it all in the hands of one person seems to be asking too much, then comes the question of who does the upkeep, who fixes the outages etc. I think Open Source is probably the…

I think this is one of the better suggestions in the thread. Find some sort of free software, throw it on github, accept pull requests of good things, and those who are to be trusted give them access.

You are building a community and being as transparent as possible in this manner will win over a lot of people instantly.

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#34

First off, I LOVE the idea. I think serial entrepreneurs like myself NEED this and it will grow into a thriving community of benevolent contributors (and hopefully less flaming) while I think it would be great to see it built from scratch putting it all in the hands of one person seems to be asking too much, then comes the question of who does the upkeep, who fixes the outages etc. I think Open Source is probably the…

I think that if you're building a start up community, your goal is to engage talent in computer science across the country/planet. I don't think there is a better way to do that then to start from the very beginning as having it that people build together. Zach has probably the best idea so far.

I think adding advertisements to help reduce the costs along with donations would also be a good start.

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#36
Existing (Open Source) tools at first for sure. Capture the audience, then extend and provide customized solutions / tools. I like zbruhnke idea as an initial project / mastermind group any one can join to get their feet wet if they dont already know a project or have one of their own they want to work on. But initially to get things started I think it would be best to use existing (open source) tools.

Once the choice of existing or new is made then the choice of technology / tools needs to be made. There are alot more existing solutions that meet the working spec needs in alot of differing technologies. So once the new/existing choice is made you really need to focus on tech (.Net, Python, Ruby, Java, etc) as this choice will help inform the number of potential contributers.

I see this working best kind of how Google did in the early days and how I hear facebook currently works. Developers post project pitches to try and gather other people (Devs, PMs Marketing, etc) to their idea, then working together to make it happen. All members of SG would be under a blanked NDA for pitch ideas and each project once started could have their own.

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#37

Convore?

This was the first idea that popped into my head, but I have not been using it yet. My only worry is that it is still not proven reliable or stood the test of time. Its seems nice and pretty, which is great, but I wouldn't want its growing pains interfering.

A more proven alternative may be simply to use google talk (with history tracking if you want that), google groups, and (gasp) email.

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#39
I'll add my 2 cents to the idea of using a pre-existent solution for the main community site.

And my vote goes for using buddy press and extend from it.

As others have said, it would be great to start this community opening up the space to code, design and ideas contributors from the very beginning.

Re: SG Mastermind 1: Build from scratch or use existing software?

#40
Overall: My vote goes to using pre-existing tools like Google Groups, HN Userbase to get started

If a component of the existing tools requires a paying element, perhaps a very low joining fee could be in order. Taking money always changes how people react of course.

e.g. USD$1 to join --> $400 kitty to spend on a paid-hosted plan

.

.

If you need to build something out, consider:

http://pinaxproject.com/ A python and django OOtB framework

.

or Tiki... which has an awful lot of features that don't require writing code:

http://info.tiki.org/Tiki+Wiki+CMS+Groupware

.

They say:

    * Wikis (like Wikipedia)
    * Forums (like phpBB)
    * Blogs (like WordPress)
    * Articles (like Yahoo News)
    * Image Gallery (like Flickr)
    * Map Server (like Google Maps)
    * Link Directory (like DMOZ)
    * Multilingual (like Babel Fish)
    * Bug Tracker (like Bugzilla)
    * RSS Feeds (like Digg)
    * Free Open Source software (LGPL) 
And much more...

    * all integrated (like no one else)
Post reply on HN