Is that... a loading screen for a text-based news website? Christ.
... aaand now we're distracted by a completely irrelevant annoyance of technology instead of discussing the content of the article and some very serious issues...
The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
31–40 of 150 posts
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Create a new account under a pseudonym. I've not been on Facebook for years, and I tried doing this recently. It was relentless in pestering me for a phone number for "security reasons". It would not accept any of the online SMS services I found. I ended up abandoning it.
Sounds like a job for a burner phone.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Create a new account under a pseudonym. I've not been on Facebook for years, and I tried doing this recently. It was relentless in pestering me for a phone number for "security reasons". It would not accept any of the online SMS services I found. I ended up abandoning it.
Sounds like a job for a burner phone.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#34I have been mulling cancelling my Facebook account for a while now. Today as I was browsing I saw several Scientology ads. I know Facebook doesn't have an agenda per se - you have the money, they have the adspace - but I was still struck by the brazenness of advertising something whose ethical dubiousness has been so thoroughly publicized. Facebook will never change unless they are forced to. We have signed away perh…
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#35The tone of the article dips a bit too far into sensationalism and fear mongering for my taste. While the concerns expressed are absolutely legitimate, I grow weary of people spreading fear for the sake of fear (or worse, clicks) without any mention of what we can do to protect ourselves. Spreading fear and then calling people to action based on that fear is not really leading us down a good path. I've noticed the ef…
Even if you leave their platform they won’t leave you alone. How exactly can you stop Facebook compiling shadow profiles?
How do you stop Google Analytics without installing more of their software?
We used to be able to say no to software, now it’s all “Not Right Now”.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like a job for a burner phone.
Why would someone buy a whole new phone just to use a shitty advertising network they explicitly did not want to use?
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#37>But the pop-up won’t let us pass without clicking “agree”. Opting out is an illusion. I mean this is a weird way to phrase it but you definitely cannot participate in modern society without hindering yourself in various meaningful ways if you do not "opt-in" to giving up your privacy. "Opt-in" requirements have consequently struck me as "privacy theatre" which mostly irritates. I don't see any solution for the curre…
>> But the pop-up won’t let us pass without clicking “agree”. Opting out is an illusion. You can generally just delete the popup from the DOM.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#38>But the pop-up won’t let us pass without clicking “agree”. Opting out is an illusion. I mean this is a weird way to phrase it but you definitely cannot participate in modern society without hindering yourself in various meaningful ways if you do not "opt-in" to giving up your privacy. "Opt-in" requirements have consequently struck me as "privacy theatre" which mostly irritates. I don't see any solution for the curre…
Sites that do not offer the equal choice between "continue with privacy intrusion" and "continue without privacy intrusion" are definitely out of compliance since 2018. Report them to ankle-biters like http://noyb.eu if you feel like making the world a little bit better.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#39The irony of the text that says "we care about your privacy" while simultaneously hiding the "deny all" button is profound.
Re: The opt-out illusion: how we have acquiesced to losing our privacy
#40>But the pop-up won’t let us pass without clicking “agree”. Opting out is an illusion. I mean this is a weird way to phrase it but you definitely cannot participate in modern society without hindering yourself in various meaningful ways if you do not "opt-in" to giving up your privacy. "Opt-in" requirements have consequently struck me as "privacy theatre" which mostly irritates. I don't see any solution for the curre…
>> But the pop-up won’t let us pass without clicking “agree”. Opting out is an illusion. You can generally just delete the popup from the DOM.